2012
DOI: 10.1038/ncomms2077
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of a bacterial voltage-gated sodium channel pore reveals mechanisms of opening and closing

Abstract: Sodium-gated ion channels open and close in response to the flow of ions. Here, McCusker et al. report the open structure of a sodium-gated ion channel pore from a bacterial homologue, and show, by comparison with the closed structure, that the movement of a C-terminal helix is sufficient to open the channel.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

19
336
3
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 272 publications
(359 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
19
336
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The differences that enabled the improvement in resolution were small but manifold, as is often the case for membrane proteins and included such things as very minor changes to the solubilisation and thrombin cleavage procedures and small changes to the protein and crystal handling procedures. As previously noted (McCusker et al , 2012), we were unable to grow any crystals under any similar conditions in the absence of sodium ions or when the sodium salts were replaced with other monovalent salts (such as lithium) in the crystallisation condition. Large crystals (above 100 μm) were soaked with 5 and 50 mM ion solutions (made using 100 mM and 1 M stock solutions containing 100% DMSO for cadmium (II) chloride, thallium (I) nitrate, manganese (II) chloride, silver (I) nitrate, or 10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 0.52% Hega10 [gel filtration buffer] for barium (II) acetate, lithium (I) chloride and calcium (II) chloride), with the aim of replacing the sodium ions with other monovalent or divalent ions to enable the detection of anomalous difference signals.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The differences that enabled the improvement in resolution were small but manifold, as is often the case for membrane proteins and included such things as very minor changes to the solubilisation and thrombin cleavage procedures and small changes to the protein and crystal handling procedures. As previously noted (McCusker et al , 2012), we were unable to grow any crystals under any similar conditions in the absence of sodium ions or when the sodium salts were replaced with other monovalent salts (such as lithium) in the crystallisation condition. Large crystals (above 100 μm) were soaked with 5 and 50 mM ion solutions (made using 100 mM and 1 M stock solutions containing 100% DMSO for cadmium (II) chloride, thallium (I) nitrate, manganese (II) chloride, silver (I) nitrate, or 10 mM Tris, 100 mM NaCl, 0.52% Hega10 [gel filtration buffer] for barium (II) acetate, lithium (I) chloride and calcium (II) chloride), with the aim of replacing the sodium ions with other monovalent or divalent ions to enable the detection of anomalous difference signals.…”
Section: Methodssupporting
confidence: 59%
“…The structures of several prokaryotic sodium channels in different functional states (Payandeh et al , 2011, 2012; McCusker et al , 2012; Zhang et al , 2012; Bagnéris et al , 2013, 2014, 2015; Tsai et al , 2013; Shaya et al , 2014) have been solved by X‐ray crystallography or electron microscopy. Functional studies on wild‐type and mutant prokaryotic channels (Ren et al , 2001; Yue et al , 2002; McCusker et al , 2011; Shaya et al , 2011; Tang et al , 2014) have suggested which regions and residues may be important for ion binding, selectivity and translocation within the SF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, the recent discovery of the smaller, tetrameric bacterial Na + channel family has provided an invaluable tool to characterize the structural features of Na V channels and investigate their interactions with general anesthetic agents at the molecular level (22,23). Several bacterial Na + channels have been crystallized (24)(25)(26)(27). These channels have a classical domain structure in which helices S1-S4 form the voltage sensor domain (VSD), S5 and S6 form the pore, and the S4-S5 linker connects the voltage sensor to the pore domain.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8-10). The detailed view of toxin binding, however, is unsupported by structural biology, as no high-resolution structure of a eukaryotic Na V has been solved to date (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16). Na V homology models, constructed based on X-ray analyses of prokaryotic Na + and K + voltage-gated channels, do not sufficiently account for experimental structure-activity relationship (SAR) data (6,(17)(18)(19)(20), and the molecular details underlying distinct differences in toxin potencies toward individual Na V subtypes remain undefined (5,6,(21)(22)(23).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%