1987
DOI: 10.1107/s0108270187091352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure of chlorotris(triphenylphosphine)copper(I)–tetrahydrofuran (1/3)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
1
1

Year Published

1988
1988
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
1
9
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…51 These examples were often obtained inadvertently, with the P−O−P fragments resulting from the evolution of R2POH and/or R2(O=)P−PR2 molecules due to isomerisation of P=O bonding in the presence of M 2+ ions (Cu, Co…). [52][53][54] Recently 67 The averages for the P-Cu-P and P-Cu-X angles, respectively 100.6(12) and 117 2 76 the Cu−P bond length is also similar to those measured in 5 and 5'.…”
Section: Formation Of Iron Complexes 3 and 3'supporting
confidence: 63%
“…51 These examples were often obtained inadvertently, with the P−O−P fragments resulting from the evolution of R2POH and/or R2(O=)P−PR2 molecules due to isomerisation of P=O bonding in the presence of M 2+ ions (Cu, Co…). [52][53][54] Recently 67 The averages for the P-Cu-P and P-Cu-X angles, respectively 100.6(12) and 117 2 76 the Cu−P bond length is also similar to those measured in 5 and 5'.…”
Section: Formation Of Iron Complexes 3 and 3'supporting
confidence: 63%
“…119 · 0(4) 115 · 8(4) C(11)-Sb-C (21) 98 · 1(5) 99 · 8(5) 99 · 7(5) 98 · 3(5) 99 · 9(5) 100 · 3(5) C(11)-Sb-C(31) 100 · 2(5) 101 · 5(4) 99 · 8(5) 101 · 4(5) 102 · 0(5) 96 · 6(5) C(21)-Sb-C(31) 100 · 1(5) 98 · 5(5) 99 · 3(5) 100 · 4(5) 98 · 7(5) 100 · 2(5) Sb-C(11)-C (12) 117 · 8(9) 120(1) 119(1) 118(1) 120(1) 118 · 2(9) Sb-C(11)-C (16) 125(1) 121(1) 124(1) 122(1) 122(1) 124(1) Sb-C(21)-C (16) 119 · 6(9) 120(1) 118 · 2(9) 117 · 2(9) 118(1) 120(1) Sb-C(21)-C (26) 122 · 6(9) 124 · 8 these: those distances and angles, associated with the E 3 MX molecular core, giving some feel for consistent perturbations which may be particularly associated with one particular lattice type vis-a-vis the others, and the overall ranges for any given parameter; inclusion of other parameters, notably ring torsion angles within the ligand, also suggest themselves as useful in an aggregate comparison, but space does not permit such a more comprehensive delineation. The following general comments may be made in respect of the more common types.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Molecular volumes range from 1136 to 1263Å 3 , c. 10% change, the extrema corresponding to pseudo-halogen anionic ligands, these Distances/Å Sb-C(11) 2 · 122(5) 2 · 121(6) 2 · 120(5) Sb-C (21) 2 · 128(6) 2 · 129(6) 2 · 136(5) Sb-C(31) 2 · 121(5) 2 · 107(5) 2 · 103 (5) Angles/degrees Ag-Sb-C(11) 113 · 9(1) 116 · 1(1) 120 · 0(2) Ag-Sb-C (21) 118 · 9(2) 124 · 4(2) 121 · 9(1) Ag-Sb-C(31) 123 · 1(1) 111 · 0(2) 109 · 1(2) C(11)-Sb-C (21) 99 · 7(2) 99 · 8(2) 102 · 5(2) C(11)-Sb-C(31) 100 · 9(2) 103 · 2(2) 101 · 2(2) C(21)-Sb-C(31) 96 · 2(2) 99 · 0(2) 98 · 3(2) Sb-C(11)-C (12) 118 · 7(4) 118 · 4(4) 117 · 0(4) Sb-C(11)-C (16) 122 · 5(4) 123 · 2(4) 123 · 4(4) Sb-C(21)-C (22) 118 · 4(5) 119 · 4(4) 118 · 9(4) Sb-C(21)-C (26) 121 · 9(5) 121 · 8(5) 122 · 1(4) Sb-C(31)-C (22) 119 · 2(4) 117 · 9(4) 117 · 1(4) Sb-C(31)-C(36) 122 · 8(4) 124 · 7(4) 124 · 4(5)…”
Section: Type A(ii) Monoclinic P2 1 /N Z = 4 Moleculesunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The remaining two, both as tetrahydrofuran solvates, crystallize as two polymorphs, viz. a noncentrosymmetric form in P6 3 (Folting et al, 1987) and a centrosymmetric form in P2 1 /c (Carlson et al, 1996;Kraü ter & Neumü ller, 1996). This report presents the second known polymorph of the (pure) title compound.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%