“…To avoid any crystallization, the samples were annealed at 250 °C. The difference in the Raman spectra highlights that the electrodeposited amorphous films show structures fundamentally different from that of crystalline MoS 2 . ,, This is also evident in the XRD where the crystallized sample exhibits a strong diffraction of the Mo (002) plane, whereas the samples annealed at 250 °C only show a slight hump, likely due to short-range ordering. , The non-annealed samples do not exhibit any hump, and no samples exhibited features other than that of MoS 2 or the substrates (Figure S3). Additionally, when left in air, the features associated with MoO vibrations increase in intensity, demonstrating that the film oxidizes over time. , Both annealed samples closely resemble the as deposited spectra; however, there are small differences around 450 and 530 cm –1 .…”