“…Released As atoms, in turn, diffuse toward the surface. This phenomenon is energetically much more favorable than, for example, As–O bonding or strain inducing short O–O dimer bonds on the surface. , In 2 O has been usually shown to cause +0.5 eV shift at the vacuum-InAs(100) surfaces, but in Figure it can be seen that the Al 2 O 3 /crystalline oxide interfaces do not exactly exhibit this fingerprint +0.5 eV component. However, in the present measurements the oxidized InAs interfaces lie clearly below the topmost Al 2 O 3 (12 nm) film, deep inside a solid, which can cause variation in the potential as discussed above.…”