2014
DOI: 10.1021/jp5079136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structure, Stability, and Substituent Effects in Aromatic S-Nitrosothiols: The Crucial Effect of a Cascading Negative Hyperconjugation/Conjugation Interaction

Abstract: Aromatic S-nitrosothiols (RSNOs) are of significant interest as potential donors of nitric oxide and related biologically active molecules. Here, we address a number of poorly understood properties of these species via a detailed density functional theory and the natural bond orbital (NBO) investigation of the parent PhSNO molecule. We find that the characteristic perpendicular orientation of the -SNO group relative to the phenyl ring is determined by a combination of the steric factors and the donor-acceptor … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties. 19,34,98 The accurate FPD data on the CH 3 SNO structure reported here are consistent with the antagonistic model. Compared to HSNO, the S-N bond is ~0.03 Å shorter (1.814 Å vs 1.842 Å in cis-CH 3 SNO and cis-HSNO, respectively) and 2.7 kcal/mol stronger (D 0 is 32.4 vs 29.7 in cis-CH 3 SNO and trans-HSNO), and the rotation barrier is ~3 kcal/mol higher (E 0 ≠ is 12.7 vs.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snosupporting
confidence: 84%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties. 19,34,98 The accurate FPD data on the CH 3 SNO structure reported here are consistent with the antagonistic model. Compared to HSNO, the S-N bond is ~0.03 Å shorter (1.814 Å vs 1.842 Å in cis-CH 3 SNO and cis-HSNO, respectively) and 2.7 kcal/mol stronger (D 0 is 32.4 vs 29.7 in cis-CH 3 SNO and trans-HSNO), and the rotation barrier is ~3 kcal/mol higher (E 0 ≠ is 12.7 vs.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snosupporting
confidence: 84%
“…It elegantly accounts for the extreme malleability of the S-N bond in the presence of charged or neutral Lewis acids and bases, 20,96,97 provides chemically intuitive description of subtle substituent effects in RSNOs, 19,34,98 and explains the ability of RSNOs to engage in two competing reaction modes with the same molecule. 21,95,97,99 The antagonistic paradigm also provides a useful framework for designing novel RSNO reactions 97 as well as RSNOs with desired properties.…”
Section: Antagonistic Nature Of Ch 3 Snomentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The C atom of the SP 2 hybrid orbital formed C=C, and the C=C had one σ bond and one π bond. The π bond tended to bond with electrons from other atoms, making the diamond surface electronegative [30][31][32]. Therefore, the electronegativity of the porous diamond surface was stronger than that of the ordinary diamond surface (Fig.…”
Section: Zeta Potential Of Diamond Surfacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…4 The most known hyperconjugative effect in the literature is the anomeric effect (negative hyperconjugation n→σ*) which is commonly observed in carbohydrates, and whose definition can be extended to structures with a C-X-C-Y pattern (where X = N, O or S and Y = Br, Cl, F, N, O or S), and the generalized prefix is added to the effect name. 5,6 These concepts are important to explain properties, stabilization and reactivities of chemical structures, 7,8,9 and primarily has its application in organic chemistry and natural products research.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%