A general method is described for substitution of Mn(II) and Co(ll) into the diiron sites of hemerythrin and myohemerythrin. Characterizations of these metalsubstituted proteins show that their stAcures closely resemble those ofthe native proteins. In particular, the four-helix bundle strcture appears to be maintained. The apomyohemerythrin retains most of the native helix content but is considerably less stable to denaturation than are the metal-containing proteins.The relative afnities of M(l) for apohemery thrn-nmely, Co > Fe > Mn-parallel the stabilities of the M2myoheme-rythrlns to denaturation by gdinium chloride. These results indicate that for myohemerythrin (i) the majority of the helical s re found in the native protein does not require incorporation of M(II) and (ii) stabilization of the native structure relative to the fully unfolded structure appears to be due predominantly to M(H)- Although the pathways by which proteins fold into their native structures in vivo are difficult to examine directly, the large number of in vitro refolding studies provides a useful framework for understanding in vivo folding (1-5). Prosthetic groups in general are known to stabilize the native folded structure, but only a few examinations of the role of metal ions in nonheme protein folding have been undertaken (e.g., see ref.3), despite the large and rapidly growing number of nonheme metalloproteins that can be reconstituted by addition of metal ions (6).
Scheme IFor several reasons, the nonheme iron 02-carrying proteins hemerythrin (Hr) and myohemerythrin (myoHr) are excellent candidates for examining the process of nonheme metal ion insertion and its connection to protein folding and stability. Hr and myoHr are structurally well-characterized and their biological activity-i.e., 02 binding-can be readily observed and quantitated. The secondary, tertiary, and diiron site structures of the subunits in Hr and myoHr (shown schematically in Scheme I) are quite similar to each other (7-9). Though myoHr is monomeric, Hr is usually octameric; thus, comparisons of the refolding of Hr vs. myoHr would allow assessments of the effects of intersubunit interactions on refolding of two nearly identical protein structures. The subunit in Hr and myoHr has a "four-helix bundle" structure with ==70%o a-helix and contains a diiron active site that binds one molecule of 02 at Fe2. The four-helix bundle is a structural motif found in several proteins (ref. 10 and references therein), but only in the case of cytochrome b562 has an investigation of the role of the prosthetic group in protein folding and stability recently been initiated (11). The two iron atoms comprising the active site in Hr and myoHr are ligated by a total of seven amino acid side chains with either one or two ligand residues from each of the four helical regions. In effect the diiron site cross-links the four helices (see Scheme I). For this reason and because of the relatively small sizes of Hr and myoHr (Mr "13,500 and ='13,900, respectively, per diiron site), ...