1991
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2836(91)90703-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of deoxy and oxy hemerythrin at 2.0 Å resolution

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
179
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 212 publications
(187 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
8
179
0
Order By: Relevance
“…hemerythrin and myohemerythrin [18]. The mutational evidence on AlkB presented in this study is consistent with the hypothesis that these residues are involved in coordination of the diiron center, because substitution of any of the eight conserved histidines resulted in complete loss of measurable activity, while substitution of three adjacent non-conserved histidine residues resulted in modest reductions of activity compared to those of wild type.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…hemerythrin and myohemerythrin [18]. The mutational evidence on AlkB presented in this study is consistent with the hypothesis that these residues are involved in coordination of the diiron center, because substitution of any of the eight conserved histidines resulted in complete loss of measurable activity, while substitution of three adjacent non-conserved histidine residues resulted in modest reductions of activity compared to those of wild type.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Class I contains the soluble O 2 -carrying proteins hemerythrin and myohemerythrin, coordinated primarily via nitrogen ligands [18]. Class II includes the soluble methane monooxygenase, ribonucleotide reductase and soluble plant v 9 -desaturases in which the diiron center is primarily coordinated via oxygen ligands [11,19^21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3) for the M2myoHrs indicate a considerable degree of unfolding cooperativity, in contrast to the behavior of apomyoHr. The lack of appreciable unfolding cooperativity in apomyoHr can be attributed to fewer interhelical interactions than are known to occur in the native proteins (9,31). The reduced number of interhelical interactions would be required to accommodate solvation of the seven iron ligand residues, which are all quite polar (see Scheme I).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hr and myoHr are structurally well-characterized and their biological activity-i.e., 02 binding-can be readily observed and quantitated. The secondary, tertiary, and diiron site structures of the subunits in Hr and myoHr (shown schematically in Scheme I) are quite similar to each other (7)(8)(9). Though myoHr is monomeric, Hr is usually octameric; thus, comparisons of the refolding of Hr vs. myoHr would allow assessments of the effects of intersubunit interactions on refolding of two nearly identical protein structures.…”
Section: Scheme Imentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In biological systems, a µ-hydroxo-bis(µ-carboxylato) diiron(II) structure was found in the active site of hemerythrin [1]. Previously, [2].…”
Section: Bis(µ-carboxylato) Bridge a µ-Phenoxo-bis(µ-carboxylato)mentioning
confidence: 99%