2004
DOI: 10.1074/jbc.m404298200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Structures of Human Cytosolic NADP-dependent Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Reveal a Novel Self-regulatory Mechanism of Activity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

22
594
1
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 362 publications
(621 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
22
594
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Each IDH1 subunit consists of three domains: a large domain (residues 1-103 and 286-414), a small domain (residues 104-136 and 186-285), and a clasp domain (residues 137-185; Figure 1A). In the structure of the IDH1 H/H -NADP complex, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site of each subunit even though no NADP was added in the crystallization solution, indicating that similar to the wild-type IDH1 [14], the mutant IDH1 was co-purified with a tightly bound NADP from the expression system. In the structures of both IDH1 H/H -NADP-ICT and IDH1 R/H -NADP-ICT complexes, in each subunit, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site and an ICT bound at a site composed of NADP and residues Thr77, Ser94, and Arg100 of the large domain ( Figure 1A and 1B) which is distinct from the ICTbinding site in the IDH1 R/R -NADP-ICT-Ca complex [14] (see discussion later).…”
Section: Overall Structures Of the R132h Mutant Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Each IDH1 subunit consists of three domains: a large domain (residues 1-103 and 286-414), a small domain (residues 104-136 and 186-285), and a clasp domain (residues 137-185; Figure 1A). In the structure of the IDH1 H/H -NADP complex, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site of each subunit even though no NADP was added in the crystallization solution, indicating that similar to the wild-type IDH1 [14], the mutant IDH1 was co-purified with a tightly bound NADP from the expression system. In the structures of both IDH1 H/H -NADP-ICT and IDH1 R/H -NADP-ICT complexes, in each subunit, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site and an ICT bound at a site composed of NADP and residues Thr77, Ser94, and Arg100 of the large domain ( Figure 1A and 1B) which is distinct from the ICTbinding site in the IDH1 R/R -NADP-ICT-Ca complex [14] (see discussion later).…”
Section: Overall Structures Of the R132h Mutant Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the structure of the IDH1 H/H -NADP complex, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site of each subunit even though no NADP was added in the crystallization solution, indicating that similar to the wild-type IDH1 [14], the mutant IDH1 was co-purified with a tightly bound NADP from the expression system. In the structures of both IDH1 H/H -NADP-ICT and IDH1 R/H -NADP-ICT complexes, in each subunit, there is an NADP bound at the NADP-binding site and an ICT bound at a site composed of NADP and residues Thr77, Ser94, and Arg100 of the large domain ( Figure 1A and 1B) which is distinct from the ICTbinding site in the IDH1 R/R -NADP-ICT-Ca complex [14] (see discussion later). In all the mutant IDH1 complexes, two key structural elements encompassing residues 132-141 and residues 271-286 (designated as seg1 and seg2, respectively) exhibit great flexibility with the majority of them being disordered (Supplementary information, Table S1; see discussion later).…”
Section: Overall Structures Of the R132h Mutant Complexesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Mutations in IDH2 in gliomas occur at a much lower frequency (0–6%) than IDH1 88 in the paralogous amino acid residue—R140—but also at R172. These residues are key in the activity of IDH enzymes: Arg132 and Arg172 in IDH1 and Arg140 and Arg172 in IDH2 form hydrophilic hydrogen bonds with the α‐carboxyl and β‐carboxyl groups of isocitrate to facilitate isocitrate binding in the enzyme active site 99, 100. Mutations in these residues decrease binding affinity for isocitrate and increase binding affinity for NADPH, leading to the reduction of αKG by NADPH and the release of the (R) enantiomer of 2‐hydroxyglutarate [(R)‐2HG] 101.…”
Section: Mutations Of Mitochondrial (And Associated) Metabolic Enzymementioning
confidence: 99%