“…Substitution of the quinoline ring by one or several electronwithdrawing substituent(s) resulted in al ower affinity forC u II : log K app [Cu II -L] = 9.7 to 10.8 for TDMQ5, 8, 9, 10, 11,1 2, 13, 16, and 18, whose quinoline was substituted by 5,7-Cl 2 ,5 -F,6 -F, 5,6-Cl 2 ,5 -Cl, 6-Cl, 7-Cl, 6-CF 3 ,a nd 4-Cl, respectively.M ore importantly,t he affinity for Cu II was drastically modulated by the side chain. The values of log K app were 9.8, 10.2, and 16.5 for TDMQ5 (n = 1, m = 2), TDMQ19( n = 1, m = 3), and TDMQ20 (n = 2, m = 2), respectively.T his indicates that increasing the length of the proximal part of the sidec hain (TDMQ20 compared to 19), but not the distal part (TDMQ19 compared to TDMQ5), resultedi ni ncreasing the affinity for Cu II by about six orders of magnitude. In addition, TDMQ20, having such an aliphatic diamines ide chain (equal distal and proximal chains with two methylene residues each) seems to be an optimal feature:afurtheri ncrease in the distal chain resulted in ad rastically lower log K app (Cu II -TDMQ21 = 8.1, n = 2, m = 3).…”