With over 20·000 species of teleost fish, considerable interspecific diversity in cardiac anatomy and physiology is expected. This is the outcome of evolutionary adaptation to different habits, modes of life and activity levels. For example, athletic species have a more powerful heart than sedentary species, and fish such as hagfish, carp and eel normally show a much higher degree of myocardial hypoxia tolerance than species such as salmonids (Farrell, 1991;Farrell and Jones, 1992). Plasticity in cardiac form and function has also been demonstrated during ontogeny, and the cardiovascular flexibility exhibited during embryonic and larval development, is nicely reviewed by Pelster (2003). What is less well appreciated, however, is the high degree of intraspecific cardiac plasticity displayed by post-larval fishes. Accordingly, this review explores what is known about intraspecific cardiac plasticity among juvenile and adult fishes. This intraspecific plasticity, like that exhibited during development, may well reflect individual variability on which natural selection could act.In this review, we focus primarily on temperature effects, which are relatively well studied, and on the effects of other environmental and biological factors that modify cardiac anatomy and physiology, including food deprivation, sexual maturation, exercise training and rearing under aquaculture conditions. Further, we summarize recent work on cardiac preconditioning and myocardial hypoxia tolerance in fishes, and discuss the potential implications of this work.Preconditioning is a short-term form of cardiac plasticity that has the potential to protect the heart from insults that might normally lead to cardiac damage, dysfunction or death. Preconditioning has been the focus of several thousand mammalian studies (e.g. see review by Yellon and Downey, 2003), and so the handful of recent studies in fish, which already point to important intraspecific differences, may find application outside the piscine world. Similarly, researchers who wish to stimulate cardiac growth to replace damaged myocardial tissue in mammals, may be heartened to discover that fish cardiac tissue, unlike the mammalian heart, does not lose its ability for hyperplastic growth with age. In fact, we suspect that the high degree of intraspecific plasticity that we Fish cardiac physiology and anatomy show a multiplicity of intraspecific modifications when exposed to prolonged changes in environmentally relevant parameters such as temperature, hypoxia and food availability, and when meeting the increased demands associated with training/increased activity and sexual maturation. Further, there is evidence that rearing fish under intensive aquaculture conditions significantly alters some, but not all, aspects of cardiac anatomy and physiology. This review focuses on the responses of cardiac physiology and anatomy to these challenges, highlighting where applicable, the importance of hyperplastic (i.e. the production of new cells) vs hypertrophic (the enlargement of existing cells...