Struggles over corporate social responsibility meanings in teaching practices: The case of hybrid problem-based learning

Abstract

Although experiential learning has been widely discussed in relation to the teaching of corporate social responsibility, the socially mediated and discursive nature of experiential learning approaches to corporate social responsibility has been either neglected or given only cursory coverage in the literature. Considering this gap, I problematise corporate social responsibility education within the axioms of managerialism, arguing that it should also allow business students to critically evaluate, analyse and question the basic premises underlying contemporary business practices. Using an action research approach, I explore the possibilities and challenges of using hybrid problem-based learning to help business students engage in critically reflexive processes and, thus, the social construction of corporate social responsibility meanings. Drawing on discourse analysis, I illustrate two central discursive patterns that characterise the struggle over corporate social responsibility meanings in a series of courses implemented in the business curriculum of a Nordic university between the years 2007 and 2010. The findings offer empirical support for several key arguments in the debate over corporate social responsibility education.

Sustainable Development in Supply Chain Management: The Role of Organizational Learning for Policy Implementation

“…In this study, we draw on recent research (e.g. Blackman et al ., ; Garcia‐Rosell, ) and argue that organizational learning is an important, but often overlooked, factor in understanding firms' ability to implement both environmental and social policy in supply chains.…”

Sustainability and human competences: a systematic literature review

“…However, some studies do not specify which competences would be adequate for sustainability but rather deal with the competences’ relevance to teaching, together with the knowledge and skills for it (Almers, 2013; Barth and Rieckmannm, 2012; Blewitt, 2010; Fisk and Ahearn, 2006; Garcia-Rosell, 2013; Hanning et al , 2012; Koch, 2005; Mochizuki and Fadeeva, 2010; Sammalisto et al , 2015; Seay, 2015; Steiner and Posch, 2006). As previously stated, sets of knowledge and skills, together with experiences, values, personal and job history consist in the resources that, when combined and mobilised, may turn into competences (Sandberg, 2000; Maggi, 2003; Haland and Tjora, 2006).…”

Training Future Managers to Address the Challenges of Sustainable Development: An Innovative, Interdisciplinary, and Multiregional Experience on Corporate Sustainability Education

“…In Mexico, a course incorporated sustainable supply chain management into industrial and systems engineering [36]. In Finland, a series of courses explored the social construction of CSR meanings in business and tourism [41]. Other countries in Europe have presented diverse initiatives, including France, which integrated corporate sustainability and CSR into design, engineering, and business [42], Spain, which connected business, economics, and finance with sustainable consumption and CSR management [43], Denmark, which offered an MOOC on corporate sustainability in the fashion industry [38], and Germany, which offered an MBA program integrating sustainable management into international business [39].…”