2018 IEEE International Electron Devices Meeting (IEDM) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/iedm.2018.8614560
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

STT-MRAM Design Technology Co-optimization for Hardware Neural Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table IV summarizes the comparison with prior art on in-memory computing architectures based on non-volatile arrays, including the proposed STT-BNN architecture as reported for a 128 × 128 sub-array size. From this table, the maximum achievable classification accuracy of STT-BNN over the MNIST dataset is equivalent to [8], [35] and better than [15] by 3.4%. The work in [8] uses a 3-bit multilevel sense amplifier (i.e., a 3-bit ADC) to push the classification accuracy over the CIFAR-10 dataset at 86.08%, which is 6.07% higher than the proposed STT-BNN.…”
Section: System-level Validation and Comparison With Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table IV summarizes the comparison with prior art on in-memory computing architectures based on non-volatile arrays, including the proposed STT-BNN architecture as reported for a 128 × 128 sub-array size. From this table, the maximum achievable classification accuracy of STT-BNN over the MNIST dataset is equivalent to [8], [35] and better than [15] by 3.4%. The work in [8] uses a 3-bit multilevel sense amplifier (i.e., a 3-bit ADC) to push the classification accuracy over the CIFAR-10 dataset at 86.08%, which is 6.07% higher than the proposed STT-BNN.…”
Section: System-level Validation and Comparison With Prior Artmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a consequence, most STT-MRAM-based in-memory BNN macros only perform bit-wise operations with two or three operands per memory access, as larger numbers of operands degrade the accuracy of the MAC computation and ultimately the classification accuracy [13], [14], [17], [18]. The macros in [15] and [16] only support 0 or +1 values for activations with the limitations as in [5] and [6].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, most of these solutions neither consider the effects of STT-MRAM and CMOS process, voltage and temperature (PVT) variations, nor the RC delay mismatch to validate the computing accuracy; hence they could be highly optimistic about design closures. Existing efforts that do consider these effects mainly focus only on read operations and do not implement CIM-based logic operations [4,10,11]. Moreover, prior work on STT-MRAM based CIM lacks silicon-driven investigations to accurately determine the impact of these non-idealities on the computing accuracy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29,34,56,58,59,75,[90][91][92][93] lists the recent neural network implementations. Several in-MRAM computing studies were implemented and verified using a 2x nm CMOS process.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%