1994
DOI: 10.1177/105268469400400505
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Assessment Tasks and Knowledge: Comparing Superintendents and Elementary and Secondary Principals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Places for comments were also included on the questionnaire. A more complete description of the survey methods and the instrument used can be found in Impara et al (1994). Also reported in Impara et al (1994) are the results of the frequency with which the 1,700 responding superintendents and elementary and secondary school principals (a) performed the tasks, (b) rated their level of competency on the KSAs, and (c) rated the KSAs as needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Places for comments were also included on the questionnaire. A more complete description of the survey methods and the instrument used can be found in Impara et al (1994). Also reported in Impara et al (1994) are the results of the frequency with which the 1,700 responding superintendents and elementary and secondary school principals (a) performed the tasks, (b) rated their level of competency on the KSAs, and (c) rated the KSAs as needed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a subsequent study, Impara, Plake, and Merwin (1994) identified specific student assessment tasks performed by educational administrators. They also identified knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAsll administrators need to perform these tasks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…KSAs 2, 6, 11, and 13 are stated in very general terms, a criticism made of the KSAs found in the previous research. These KSAs were included because they were specifically mentioned by respondents in the Stage 1 survey reported by Impara et al (1994).…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%