2007
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.01912
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student E-Learning Intrinsic Motivation: A Qualitative Analysis

Abstract: In the age of lifelong learning and increased competition for time, motivation becomes a salient issue. Students need to be more intrinsically motivated in the absence of more formal structure. This is especially true in online learning environments where direct instructor influence is mitigated. Online learning environments typically embrace many choices in ways in which learning material is presented and interaction with students is supported in both individual and collaborative contexts. As such, it is impe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
36
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
2
36
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Nevertheless, we were able to locate some relevant instruments that measure the acceptance of other web-based learning platforms like Moodle, Blackboard, e-LMS, WBLS and etc. Even though there have been studies on grid-based online or e-learning that used SDT from the students' perspective (Hartnett et al, 2011;Shroff & Vogel, 2009;Shroff et al 2008Shroff et al , 2007Xie et al 2006), however there are hardly any of the grid-based VLE related studies which have examined the effects of SDT and CET on the acceptance and instructional effectiveness of the VLE especially from the viewpoint of the K12 teachers or instructors. All of The degree of the desire to feel effective in attaining valued outcomes.…”
Section: Existing Vle Related Measurement Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, we were able to locate some relevant instruments that measure the acceptance of other web-based learning platforms like Moodle, Blackboard, e-LMS, WBLS and etc. Even though there have been studies on grid-based online or e-learning that used SDT from the students' perspective (Hartnett et al, 2011;Shroff & Vogel, 2009;Shroff et al 2008Shroff et al , 2007Xie et al 2006), however there are hardly any of the grid-based VLE related studies which have examined the effects of SDT and CET on the acceptance and instructional effectiveness of the VLE especially from the viewpoint of the K12 teachers or instructors. All of The degree of the desire to feel effective in attaining valued outcomes.…”
Section: Existing Vle Related Measurement Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disorientation and distraction, for example, can result from the freedom and flexible instructional design that are part of learner‐controlled e‐learning. Both can occur when users perceive themselves as having too many choices that require a “perceived unnecessary effort” (Shroff et al., , p. 253). In such cases, the necessity to control the e‐learning system may cause “difficulties in information selection, information sequencing, and pacing,” which lead to cognitive overload (Scheiter & Gerjets, , p. 291).…”
Section: Dimensions Of Learner Control In E‐learningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, universities have begun offering online courses which are accessible worldwide (Allen & Seaman, ). At the same time, new advances in e‐learning technologies, such as virtual and asynchronous self‐paced approaches, have increased learners’ autonomy and self‐control (DeRouin et al., ; Sahay, ; Shroff, Vogel, Coombes, & Lee, ). In this context, learner control refers to leaners’ freedom of choice, self‐governance, and independence, and is reflected in their sense of autonomy concerning the “use and effects of technology” (Sahay, , p. 294).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These factors include the rapid evolution of CMC media over the last decade, the significant number of students becoming extensive users of information and communication technology (ICT) (Horrigan, 2007), and the vast opportunities that students may have with various CMC media to enhance their learning (Jones et al, 2010; Liaw et al, 2007; Tao, 2008). Such an examination could help us maintain and enhance students' interests toward learning through technologies (Tao, 2008) and ensure the successful implementation of those technologies (Kuehn, 1994; Shroff, Vogel, Coombes, & Lee, 2007). However, this growing interest in CMC use has not yet been matched by sufficient attention to identifying a systematic framework describing students' reasons for using (and thus also not using) these technologies in their learning contexts (Guo, Tan, & Cheung, 2010; Tao, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%