2021
DOI: 10.1007/s10919-021-00364-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Evaluations Fast and Slow: It's Time to Integrate Teachers' Nonverbal Behavior in Evaluations of Teaching Effectiveness

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From the teachers' teaching behaviors under the information environment, Teo T et al [1] evaluated the self-reported willingness of Singaporean and Malaysian preservice teachers to use the information technologies in the future; Stes et al [2] investigated the influence of teaching development on students perceived teacher behaviors, and the repeated analyses of variance and covariance showed that the teaching behaviors were insignificantly affected by the teaching development; Wang J et al [3] analyzed the differences of high school physics teachers in Beijing, Taipei, and Chicago on their understanding levels of inquiry teaching under the cloud learning environment. Results revealed that the teachers from Beijing paid attention to teachers when understanding the inquiry teaching, while those from Chicago centered on students; Babad E et al [4] measured the different influences of teacher behaviors and nonverbal and verbal instantaneity on teaching effect, as the information technologies continuously entered the teaching process, the teaching environment gradually became open with ever-diversified functions. The information-based classroom teaching under the technical support should fully manifest the "student-centered" teaching concept, and teachers are transformed from knowledge transmitters into teaching guides and auxiliaries who should design teaching adaptable to student learning and improve the educational and teaching quality by taking the objectives of cultivating students' lifelong learning ability, as well as cognitive ability, cooperative ability and innovation ability adapting to the development of the times.…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From the teachers' teaching behaviors under the information environment, Teo T et al [1] evaluated the self-reported willingness of Singaporean and Malaysian preservice teachers to use the information technologies in the future; Stes et al [2] investigated the influence of teaching development on students perceived teacher behaviors, and the repeated analyses of variance and covariance showed that the teaching behaviors were insignificantly affected by the teaching development; Wang J et al [3] analyzed the differences of high school physics teachers in Beijing, Taipei, and Chicago on their understanding levels of inquiry teaching under the cloud learning environment. Results revealed that the teachers from Beijing paid attention to teachers when understanding the inquiry teaching, while those from Chicago centered on students; Babad E et al [4] measured the different influences of teacher behaviors and nonverbal and verbal instantaneity on teaching effect, as the information technologies continuously entered the teaching process, the teaching environment gradually became open with ever-diversified functions. The information-based classroom teaching under the technical support should fully manifest the "student-centered" teaching concept, and teachers are transformed from knowledge transmitters into teaching guides and auxiliaries who should design teaching adaptable to student learning and improve the educational and teaching quality by taking the objectives of cultivating students' lifelong learning ability, as well as cognitive ability, cooperative ability and innovation ability adapting to the development of the times.…”
Section: Research Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some attempts have been made to tackle the unintended effects of SET and optimise its use for learning and improvement (Babad et al, 2021;Mutch & Tatebe, 2017;Norsworthy & Sanders, 2021;Roxå et al, 2021;Stein et al, 2021;Thiel, 2019). One suggestion was to redesign SET to focus on affective aspects rather than just on cognitive aspects of the faculty member's performance (Babad et al, 2021). Another suggestion was to reframe SET as continuous or reflexive dialogues between HEIs, faculty members, students (Roxå et al, 2021;Stein et al, 2021).…”
Section: Set In Global Highermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faculty members plan and organise course material [23] design ζ 2 Course schedule α9 Teacher's schedule of class time for the course's teaching schedule [26] Teaching style α10 Ways and means for teachers to teach [21,26]…”
Section: Student Learning Abilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interaction between teachers and students in regard to frequency, manner, method and effectiveness [26] Classroom communication α16…”
Section: Teacher-student Interaction α15mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation