2018
DOI: 10.14686/buefad.400787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Student Performance Task Assessment Using Multiple Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Techniques: An Application for 9th Grade Chemistry Course

Abstract: This study was conducted with the aim to analyze some of the problems related to measurement and evaluation encountered in student performance task assessment. Multiple criteria decision-making methods were utilized in this study. The criteria adopted in the assessment of performance tasks and the weights of learning domains were calculated through AHP. Predicated upon the weights of cognitive, affective, and psychomotor domains, the criteria were selected through TOPSIS technique. According to the findings of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

3
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, aij is ≠ 0 (Vashishtha and Ramachandran, 2006). In AHP, the scale given in Table 1 (Saaty, 1980) is used for binary comparisons (Yüksel and Geban, 2018). The reason for using AHP (Saaty, 1980) technique in this study is its suitability to the purpose and characteristics of the problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, aij is ≠ 0 (Vashishtha and Ramachandran, 2006). In AHP, the scale given in Table 1 (Saaty, 1980) is used for binary comparisons (Yüksel and Geban, 2018). The reason for using AHP (Saaty, 1980) technique in this study is its suitability to the purpose and characteristics of the problem.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The opinions of the expert group were used in the binary comparisons of the components and sub-components in the AHP model. The expert group made the evaluations with the scale (Saaty, 1980;Yüksel and Geban, 2018) given in Table 1. The expert group of the research consisted of two experienced chemistry teachers who gave 9th grade chemistry lessons and the author of the study.…”
Section: Teacher Support (Ts)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another AHP feature is aij ≠ 0' (Vashishtha and Ramachandran, 2006). Binary comparisons in AHP are made with the scale (Table 1) improved by Saaty (1980) (Yüksel and Geban, 2018). In AHP, the matrices determined as a result of binary comparisons of the elements contained in the model are square (nxn) matrices.…”
Section: Attitudes Towards Studentsmentioning
confidence: 99%