2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10853-018-2179-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of structural, optical, and electrical properties associated with defects in sodium-doped copper oxide (CuO/Na) nanostructures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

7
39
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 136 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
7
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Rietveld analysis of XRD pattern is shown in Fig. 2 a. Refinement was undertaken in space group C 2h 6 , C2/C for monoclinic CuO with all atoms in general positions [ 57 , 58 ]. The marked (110), (002), ( 11), (111), (200), (11 ), (20 ), (112), (020), (021), (022), (11 ), (113), (310), (113), and (220) hkl diffraction planes (│standing line for Bragg position θ) are well indexed to standard CuO (JCPDS card No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Rietveld analysis of XRD pattern is shown in Fig. 2 a. Refinement was undertaken in space group C 2h 6 , C2/C for monoclinic CuO with all atoms in general positions [ 57 , 58 ]. The marked (110), (002), ( 11), (111), (200), (11 ), (20 ), (112), (020), (021), (022), (11 ), (113), (310), (113), and (220) hkl diffraction planes (│standing line for Bragg position θ) are well indexed to standard CuO (JCPDS card No.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2a. Refinement was undertaken in space group C 6 2h , C2/C for monoclinic CuO with all atoms in general positions [57,58]. The marked (110), (002), ( After numerous recursive refinements, the possible bestrefined lattice parameters obtained are as follows (weighted profile factor (R wp ) = 12.3, profile factor (R p ) = 11.9, expected R-factor (R exp ) = 7.8, Bragg R-factor (R Bragg ) = 7.02, goodness of fit (GOF) = 1.03 and χ 2 = 1.48) with unit cell parameters a = 4.6878 Ǻ, b = 3.4269 Ǻ, and c = 5.14567 Ǻ, and crystallite size ~ 15.7 nm, by using Scherrer's formula [56].…”
Section: Structural and Optical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the remarkable differences in the size of the radius of Na + (1.02 Å) and Cu 2+ (0.73 Å) and in the valence charges, the presence of the external Na + impurity may affect the growth process of the crystal, leading to the dissimilar irregular morphology as observed in Figure S4, Supporting Information. [ 23 ] It is also found that the crystallite size decreases with the presence of a small amount of Na + (Table S1, Supporting Information). [ 23 ] The washing and filtration procedure after the precipitation is the same for the all the samples synthesized in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[ 23 ] It is also found that the crystallite size decreases with the presence of a small amount of Na + (Table S1, Supporting Information). [ 23 ] The washing and filtration procedure after the precipitation is the same for the all the samples synthesized in this study. Hence, decrease in the Cu/Na molar ratio during the synthesis leads to the presence of Na + in the CuCO 3 .Cu(OH) 2 precipitate even after the washing and filtration.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation