1988
DOI: 10.1007/bf00114852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies of the 1987 stock market crash: Review and appraisal

Abstract: Within four months of the stock market crash on October 19, 1987, there were six studies of what happened. The Brady Commission, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission, the Securities and Exchange Commission, the General Accounting Office, the New York Stock Exchange, and the Chicago Mercantile Exchange all produced reports that described and analyzed the Crash, and in some cases made recommendations for additional regulation. This paper examines the conclusions and analyses contained in these reports and pr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Better estimates of the cash index can possibly provide a more realistic picture of the difference between stock and futures values. Our results complement previous studies that have attempted to estimate the value of stock index futures on the days around the crash; see Edwards (1989) for a review of the government reports on the crash, Harris (1989) for analysis of the S&P 500 contract, Blume et al (1989), who examine pricing anomalies on Monday and Tuesday, and Bassett, France and Pliska (1989) for analysis of the MMI cash-futures spread on Monday.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Better estimates of the cash index can possibly provide a more realistic picture of the difference between stock and futures values. Our results complement previous studies that have attempted to estimate the value of stock index futures on the days around the crash; see Edwards (1989) for a review of the government reports on the crash, Harris (1989) for analysis of the S&P 500 contract, Blume et al (1989), who examine pricing anomalies on Monday and Tuesday, and Bassett, France and Pliska (1989) for analysis of the MMI cash-futures spread on Monday.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, both Bacha and Vila (1994), which employs the underlying stock index, and Chang et al (1999), which uses the underlying component stocks, find no change in price volatility in the underlying market around the SIMEX listing of the Nikkei 225 futures on September 3, 1986, while differing in the price volatility effect around the OSE listing. Similarly, Edwards (1988) and Kupiec (1998) dismiss the role played by derivative contracts in the 1987 market crash.…”
Section: Portfoliomentioning
confidence: 91%