1967
DOI: 10.1016/0005-2795(67)90461-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on actin-actin and actin-myosin interaction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be assumed that the concentration needed for rigour developmenit is considerably lower than that needed for depression of contraction. Myosin ATPase activity (Blum, 1962), the F-actin/myosin interaction (Bailin & Barany, 1967) and the troponin-tropomyosin interaction (Yasui, Fuchs & Briggs, 1968) are all influenced by -SH inhibitors and are possible molecular sites of action of NEM associated with contractile depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It can be assumed that the concentration needed for rigour developmenit is considerably lower than that needed for depression of contraction. Myosin ATPase activity (Blum, 1962), the F-actin/myosin interaction (Bailin & Barany, 1967) and the troponin-tropomyosin interaction (Yasui, Fuchs & Briggs, 1968) are all influenced by -SH inhibitors and are possible molecular sites of action of NEM associated with contractile depression.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effects that particular Redox reagents have on actin varies considerably depending on which of these small molecules are bound and/or the presence of filamentous versus globular forms of actin. For example, while treatment with hydrogen peroxide and other oxidants greatly reduces the ability of Ca 2+ ‐bound G‐actin to polymerize [DalleDonne et al, ; Milzani et al, ; Milzani et al, ; Lassing et al, ; Hung et al, ], Mg 2+ ‐bound G‐actin is largely resistant to the adverse effects of hydrogen peroxide and related oxidants [Balin and Barany ; Muhlrad et al, ; Hung et al, ; Hung et al, ]. These differences appear to be due to changes in the conformation and surface exposed residues present when actin is polymerized in the presence of Ca 2+ versus Mg 2+ , and those residues that are exposed in G‐actin versus F‐actin [Lusty and Fasold ; Collins and Elzinga, ; Konno and Morales ; Lin et al, ; Dalle‐Donne et al, ; Guan et al, ; Guan et al, ; Lassing et al, ; Takamoto et al, ].…”
Section: Actin—a Target Of Redox Speciesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A and C; [reviewed in Terman and Kashina, ]. For example, oxidation of Cys‐374 often occurs in purified actin samples with air‐exposure, aging, and freeze‐thawing [Balin and Barany, ; Ishiwata, ; Xu et al, ; Tang et al, ] and this results in disulfide bond formation between two actin monomers [Ishiwata, ; Tang et al, ]. Reducing agents such as DTT reverse these effects and are added to purified actin samples to prevent this abnormal dimerization.…”
Section: Actin—redox Susceptible Residues and Redox Effectorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several lines of evidence suggested that the SHs are involved in the polymerization of G-actin (Katz and Mommaerts, 1962;Drabikowski and Gergely, 1963)) nucleotide binding (Strohman and Samorodin, 1962;Katz, 1963;Kuehl and Gergely, 1969), and myosin combination (Perry and Cotterill, 1964;Bailin and Barany, 1967). However, some papers reported that modification of two or three cysteine residues of actin with (2-aminoethy1)isothiouronium (Seraydarian et al, 1968), with an azo dye (Lusty and Fasold, 1969) or with iodoacetate or iodoacetamide (Bridgen, 1972) exhibited no effect on the ability of G-actin to polymerize and bind myosin, nucleotide, and calcium ion.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%