“…This hypothesis would explain the localization of analgesic-associated tumours in the renal pelvis rather than the bladder, a more usual site for chemical carcinogenesis, and is not inconsistent with the previously described occurrence of transitional-cell tumours in patients with schistosomiasis40, calculous disease" and other inflammatory conditions of the urinary tract?, 4 1 In this context, it should be noted that the incidence of cancer in papillary necrosis is much higher than in other forms of chronic pyel~nephritis~, and more comparable to that in schistosomiasis, in which activation of endogenous carcinogens by the infecting parasite has been implicated. 42,43 Since, in the majority of patients with analgesic nephropathy, death from renal failure can be avoided by careful conservative management or by successful dialysis or transplantation, the probability of developing transitional-cell carcinoma may now be greater than before the establishment of chronic renal failure programmes. It is our current policy to investigate by cystoscopy and retrograde pyelography the appearance of macroscopic or microscopic haematuria in patients with analgesic nephropathy, and there may be a case for routine cytological screening of urine from all such patients.44 It is doubtful whether bilateral nephro-ureterectomy can be justified for transplant recipients with papillary necrosis since there has not yet been reported any case of carcinoma of the renal pelvis or ureter in the Australasian renal transplant p r~g r a m r n e .~~ That abuse of analgesics is a cause of cancer is not yet certain, but the mounting clinical and biochemical evidence of their carcinogenicity can no longer be ignored.…”