2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.01.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on distribution and fractionation of heavy metals in Gomti river sediments—a tributary of the Ganges, India

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

16
298
2
8

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 619 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
16
298
2
8
Order By: Relevance
“…These have special affinity for carbonate and may co-precipitate with carbonate minerals (Forstner and Wittmann, 1991). Similar results were found in a previous study (Singh, et al, 2005). Lead was dominant in F3 and which has proved to be sensitive to anthropogenic inputs (Modak, et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These have special affinity for carbonate and may co-precipitate with carbonate minerals (Forstner and Wittmann, 1991). Similar results were found in a previous study (Singh, et al, 2005). Lead was dominant in F3 and which has proved to be sensitive to anthropogenic inputs (Modak, et al, 1992).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The second method was the Risk Assessment Code (RAC) classification based on the percentage of metals in the carbonate and exchangeable fractions (Singh et al 2005). The classification is based on the strength of the bond between metals and the different geochemical fractions in sediments and the ability of metals to be released (Cai et al 2011) and enter into the food chain.…”
Section: Ecological Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The RAC assesses the potential release of metals in solution based on the percentage of exchangeable and carbonate fractions in sediments. The classification is as follows [35]: metals in exchangeable and carbonate-bound fractions <1%, no risk; 1-10%, low risk; 11-30%, medium risk; 31-50%, high risk; ≥75%, very high risk.…”
Section: Risk Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%