“…Some characteristic cytological features of each ovarian carcinoma subtype have already been described: formation of psammoma bodies and papillary or micropapillary clusters in SC; endometrial carcinoma‐like morphology and squamous differentiation in EC; tall columnar cells containing intracytoplasmic mucin with background mucin in MC; and abundant clear cytoplasm, hobnail cells, and hyalinized material in CCC . Nishino and Khunamornpong et al reported that the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian carcinoma subtyping by imprint cytology was 47.4% and 61.5%, respectively. With regard to CCC, Nishino reported that discrimination between CCC and MC is difficult when tumor cells show a honeycomb appearance with clear cytoplasm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nishino and Khunamornpong et al reported that the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian carcinoma subtyping by imprint cytology was 47.4% and 61.5%, respectively. With regard to CCC, Nishino reported that discrimination between CCC and MC is difficult when tumor cells show a honeycomb appearance with clear cytoplasm. Thus, ovarian carcinoma subtyping using cytological specimens is occasionally difficult due to overlapping cytological features of each subtype.…”
The identification of intranuclear inclusions, in particular a high frequency and multiple intranuclear inclusions in a single nucleus, is useful for the cytological diagnosis of CCC. Furthermore, these results may be applicable to ascites cytology.
“…Some characteristic cytological features of each ovarian carcinoma subtype have already been described: formation of psammoma bodies and papillary or micropapillary clusters in SC; endometrial carcinoma‐like morphology and squamous differentiation in EC; tall columnar cells containing intracytoplasmic mucin with background mucin in MC; and abundant clear cytoplasm, hobnail cells, and hyalinized material in CCC . Nishino and Khunamornpong et al reported that the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian carcinoma subtyping by imprint cytology was 47.4% and 61.5%, respectively. With regard to CCC, Nishino reported that discrimination between CCC and MC is difficult when tumor cells show a honeycomb appearance with clear cytoplasm.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nishino and Khunamornpong et al reported that the diagnostic accuracy of ovarian carcinoma subtyping by imprint cytology was 47.4% and 61.5%, respectively. With regard to CCC, Nishino reported that discrimination between CCC and MC is difficult when tumor cells show a honeycomb appearance with clear cytoplasm. Thus, ovarian carcinoma subtyping using cytological specimens is occasionally difficult due to overlapping cytological features of each subtype.…”
The identification of intranuclear inclusions, in particular a high frequency and multiple intranuclear inclusions in a single nucleus, is useful for the cytological diagnosis of CCC. Furthermore, these results may be applicable to ascites cytology.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.