1974
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1974.38.39
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Precooling and Storage of Some Varieties of Snap Beans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides the development of visual CI symptoms observed in 'Leon' snap beans stored at temperatures lower than 15°C, softening and increased shriveling in pods stored at 1°C compared with those stored at 5 and 10°C might have been a result of the higher sensitivity of this cultivar to low storage temperature compared with 'Opus' snap beans. In fact, snap bean cultivars differ significantly in their susceptibility to CI (Abou Aziz et al, 1976;Gorini et al, 1974;Morris, 1966a, 1966b). For example, Gorini et al (1974) reported a variation in the percentage of CI incidence in 17 different snap bean cultivars ranging from 0% to 42.5% when stored for 7 d at 4°C and from 0% to 48.5% when stored at 7°C for the same period of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Besides the development of visual CI symptoms observed in 'Leon' snap beans stored at temperatures lower than 15°C, softening and increased shriveling in pods stored at 1°C compared with those stored at 5 and 10°C might have been a result of the higher sensitivity of this cultivar to low storage temperature compared with 'Opus' snap beans. In fact, snap bean cultivars differ significantly in their susceptibility to CI (Abou Aziz et al, 1976;Gorini et al, 1974;Morris, 1966a, 1966b). For example, Gorini et al (1974) reported a variation in the percentage of CI incidence in 17 different snap bean cultivars ranging from 0% to 42.5% when stored for 7 d at 4°C and from 0% to 48.5% when stored at 7°C for the same period of time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, snap bean cultivars differ significantly in their susceptibility to CI (Abou Aziz et al, 1976;Gorini et al, 1974;Morris, 1966a, 1966b). For example, Gorini et al (1974) reported a variation in the percentage of CI incidence in 17 different snap bean cultivars ranging from 0% to 42.5% when stored for 7 d at 4°C and from 0% to 48.5% when stored at 7°C for the same period of time. Furthermore, the same authors concluded that as a result of CI, some cultivars can only be stored for 2 d, whereas others can be stored for 7 d. In another study, 'Romano' snap beans were only slightly affected by a 14-d storage period at 5°C, because after transfer to 15°C, their postharvest life was reduced by only 3%, whereas postharvest life of 'Top Crop' and 'Tendergreen' snap beans was reduced by 40% resulting from CI.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A reduction in firmness was observed for all the samples with increasing storage period. Weight loss values increase with increasing storage period [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%