1974
DOI: 10.1080/00015127409434200
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on Sheep Production Records

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
3

Year Published

1974
1974
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
4
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Results from the late 1970s and 1980s showed considerably lower values. However, our larger annual genetic change for weaning weight, than for carcass weight, contrasts with the results of Eikje (1975a), who found similar values for genetic change of both traits, actually indicating an increase of the dressing percentage. One explanation for the results stated was a high heritability for carcass weight, and also the pattern of genetic correlation found between dressing percentage and carcass and weaning weight (0.62 and 20.18), respectively (Gjedrem, 1971).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Results from the late 1970s and 1980s showed considerably lower values. However, our larger annual genetic change for weaning weight, than for carcass weight, contrasts with the results of Eikje (1975a), who found similar values for genetic change of both traits, actually indicating an increase of the dressing percentage. One explanation for the results stated was a high heritability for carcass weight, and also the pattern of genetic correlation found between dressing percentage and carcass and weaning weight (0.62 and 20.18), respectively (Gjedrem, 1971).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 55%
“…Correspondingly, an aggregate economic phenotype was calculated by multiplying the phenotypes of the same traits (Table 3) by the economic values. In per cent of the aggregate phenotype, the calculated genetic gain in the aggregate genotype turned out to be 1.25%, equal to that of Eikje (1975a). These results were larger than the values of 1.02% and 0.52% from the late 1970s and early 1980s, obtained by Steine (1982a and1986).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 50%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the exception of a study in Norway (Eikje 1974), earlier studies on breed evaluation (Sidwell et al 1964l ' Sidwell and Miller 1971;Dickerson et al 19721,Yesely and Peters 197 2, 191 9 ; Shrestha et al l9'7 4) were based on data from institutional flocks maintained for selection and crossbreeding studies. In the present study, daily gain and body weights of lambs from 12 different breeds of sheep (Shrestha et al 1982a;Anonymous 1983). Statistical Analysis Least squares procedures (Harvey 1975 Olson et al 1976).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%