1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf00751164
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the drag and shape of gas bubbles rising through a stagnant liquid

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
27
0
1

Year Published

1972
1972
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
6
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The test showed that the ultrasound velocity measurements are consistent within 2% of the camera data. We measure top speeds of our bubbles typically about 36 cm/s, which is consistent with other experimental measurements [2,9,30]. The relative accuracy of our velocity measurements is more precise, typically ±1 mm/s, or about 0.2% accuracy.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The test showed that the ultrasound velocity measurements are consistent within 2% of the camera data. We measure top speeds of our bubbles typically about 36 cm/s, which is consistent with other experimental measurements [2,9,30]. The relative accuracy of our velocity measurements is more precise, typically ±1 mm/s, or about 0.2% accuracy.…”
Section: Experimental Apparatus and Methodssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Aybers and Tapucu [1,2]used photographic techniques to measure bubble speed, drag coefficients, size, shape, and path. Mercier, Lyrio, and Forslund [17] used a stroboscope and several cameras to measure short sections of bubble trajectories.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This agrees with findings of other authors (Luther et al 2004;Guet et al 2005): spherical shapes are typical for bubbles up to r eq = 0.4 mm, ellipsoidal up to r eq = 1.0 mm, while bubbles of r eq > 1.0 mm can have rather complex shapes (Fig. 5) because they experience surface oscillations upon ascent due to instabilities in the wake (Saffman 1956;Aybers and Tapucu 1969a;Aybers and Tapucu 1969b;Jamialahmadi et al 1994;Leifer et al 2000). An increase in oscillation and deformation of the echo-reflecting surface of bubbles also justifies the observed increase in σ bs variability with bubble volume.…”
Section: Assessmentsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…This postulation is suitable for spherical bubbles. Still, because bubbles escaping from the sediment are large enough and thus have nonspherical shapes (Saffman 1956;Aybers and Tapucu 1969b;Clift et al 1978;Jamialahmadi et al 1994), the relation between geometric and acoustic sizes can be obtained if sizespecific patterns of bubble scatter are known. In this paper, we determined an empirical relationship between the volume of "non-resonant" bubbles and σ bs measured with a down-looking 120 kHz echosounder.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27] The density ratio of air to water is 1 : 997. The shapes of the air bubbles are characterised by the Eötvös number, Eo, the Morton number M, and the bubble Reynolds number, Re, defined as ) where d e is the equivalent bubble diameter, s is the surface tension, m is the liquid viscosity, and u T is the terminal velocity.…”
Section: Air Bubbles In Watermentioning
confidence: 99%