1985
DOI: 10.1016/0149-1970(85)90084-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Studies on the loose part evaluation technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Accordingly, the impact mass can be obtained by using the 'FR versus mass' diagram previously obtained by an experiment. 4) It is noteworthy that both the center frequency and FR methods assess the impact mass by utilizing the frequency spectra of the impact response signal. Thus these techniques are only reliable when the multi path effect of the propagating response signal is negligible and the signal has a high signalto-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Mass Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Accordingly, the impact mass can be obtained by using the 'FR versus mass' diagram previously obtained by an experiment. 4) It is noteworthy that both the center frequency and FR methods assess the impact mass by utilizing the frequency spectra of the impact response signal. Thus these techniques are only reliable when the multi path effect of the propagating response signal is negligible and the signal has a high signalto-noise ratio (SNR).…”
Section: Mass Estimation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4] Presently, many a new source localization method has been developed and successfully applied in the industry. [5][6][7] However, the mass estimation problem has not been as successful as the localization one.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using a whole set of raw APSDs will increase the complexity of the ANN model and lead to deterioration of its estimation performance. For this reason, a portion of the information in the APSD such as the FR value [8] or four-band representative values [9] have been used for the mass estimation of an impact object. For finding a considerable feature vector representing the difference between APSD curves, this study proposes a process combining two methods: a smoothing technique and the discrete cosine transform.…”
Section: Feature Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The high frequency band is the range wherein features of the used sensor are dominant and the APSD pattern is rarely changed by external excitation. The FR method has a wide uncertainty range of approximately 0.7 decade for the estimated mass [8]. In addition, the user should select how to determine the maximum and minimum frequency limits for dividing the whole frequency range into low and high ranges.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation