“…The applicability of the PSO model with both the L and the NL regressions was also proved by the fitting plots, which are given in Figure 4d. As was found in the literature, the copper ion adsorption without surfactants followed the PSO model, e.g., the Cu(II) adsorption on the H 3 PO 4 -activated rubber wood sawdust (S BET = 1673.86 m 2 /g) (0.5 g; 100 mL; pH 6; C 0 = 20 mg/L); the PSO model; %R = 80-90% (30 min); the equilibrium time = 240 min; the rate-limiting step: film diffusion (low concentrations) and particle diffusion (high concentration) [52]; the Cu(II) adsorption on Purolite S940 (S BET = 15.8 m 2 /g) and Purolite S950 (S BET = 15.7 m 2 /g) chelating ion exchangers (0.20 g, C 0 = 20 mL of 0.001 M CuCl 2 , agitation speed 180 rpm, T = 298 K, time 2 h); the PSO model; the equilibrium time = 40 min (0.001 mol/L, all ion exchangers); 5 min (0.005 mol/L, Purolite A950) [53]; the Cu(II) adsorption on Purolite S930 (1 g/L C 0 = 100, 300 mg/L, pH = 5, T = 293, 303 K, time 1 min-24 h); the PSO model; %R = 40% (4 h) [54]; the Cu(II) adsorption on Lewatit MonoPlus TP220 (0.5 g; 50 mL; C 0 = 100 mg/L, agitation speed 180 rpm, amplitude 8, T = ambient, time 1 min-4 h); the PSO model; %R = 91-100% (depending on HCl, HNO 3 concentration); the equilibrium time > 120 min (HCl), >60 min (HCl-HNO 3 systems) [30], etc. The literature reports a few examples of Cu(II) adsorption in the presence of non-ionic surfactants [55,56], but the kinetics of the adsorption process in the systems containing heavy metal ions and surfactant is not described in detail.…”