The Routledge Handbook of Study Abroad Research and Practice 2018
DOI: 10.4324/9781315639970-26
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study Abroad and L2 Learner Attitudes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, to date studies generally have not tested direct links between learner language attitudes towards specific regional or social varieties of the target language and the actual language that learners produce (with a few exceptions, discussed below, George, 2014; Rindal, 2010; Ringer‐Hilfinger, 2012). Study abroad experiences in particular have been shown to influence language learners' attitudes toward specific target language communities and varieties (e.g., Geeslin & Schmidt, 2018; Isabelli‐García, 2006; Shiri, 2013), as well as provide the necessary opportunities for exposure to dialectal linguistic forms. For these reasons, the study abroad context is an ideal setting to study the development of dialectal variants in L2 pronunciation.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, to date studies generally have not tested direct links between learner language attitudes towards specific regional or social varieties of the target language and the actual language that learners produce (with a few exceptions, discussed below, George, 2014; Rindal, 2010; Ringer‐Hilfinger, 2012). Study abroad experiences in particular have been shown to influence language learners' attitudes toward specific target language communities and varieties (e.g., Geeslin & Schmidt, 2018; Isabelli‐García, 2006; Shiri, 2013), as well as provide the necessary opportunities for exposure to dialectal linguistic forms. For these reasons, the study abroad context is an ideal setting to study the development of dialectal variants in L2 pronunciation.…”
Section: Review Of the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the dialect-specific [∅] for intervocalic /d/ can allow a L2 Spanish speaker to sound sevillano/a without sounding completely Peninsular by producing a variant such as [θ], which is likely much more linked to Peninsular Spanish. However, as Geeslin and Schmidt (2018) indicate, we know quite little about L2 and heritage Spanish speakers' attitudes toward dialect-specific phones, thus future social perception studies can provide insights into why some variables are more acquired than others.…”
Section: Dialect-specific Phonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, it is suggested that the acquisition of dialect-specific phones is dependent upon a combination of interacting factors: relative sociolinguistic salience (Pozzi & Bayley, 2020); grapheme-to-phone correspondences (Knouse, 2012); social evaluations (Geeslin & Schmidt, 2018); and in the case of heritage speakers, one's heritage language variety (Escalante, 2018;Raish, 2015). These factors, however, also interact with proficiency level.…”
Section: Dialect-specific Phonesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para medir las actitudes lingüísticas implícitas, empleamos la técnica de máscaras emparejadas. En la técnica de máscaras emparejadas, los participantes escuchan audios y clasifican a los hablantes según varias características personales, típicamente de amabilidad o simpatía e inteligencia o empleabilidad (Geeslin y Schmidt, 2018). Para cada estímulo, el mismo hablante se graba dos veces cambiando solamente la variable bajo estudio.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified