Study Approaches in Higher Education Mathematics: Investigating the Statistical Behaviour of an Instrument Translated into Norwegian

Abstract

The revised two-factor study process questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F) has widely been considered valid and reliable in many contexts for measuring students’ learning approaches. However, its cultural specificity has generated considerable discussion, with inconclusive results when translated to different languages. This paper provides more insights into the construct validity of a Norwegian version of this instrument. The R-SPQ-2F is composed of ten items designed to expose deep learning approaches and 10 items designed to expose surface learning approaches. A survey research design involving a sample of 253 first year university students in a mathematics course was adopted. Ten hypothesized models were compared using a series of confirmatory factor analyses following the model proposals reported in the literature. A weighted least square mean and variance adjusted (WLSMV) estimator was used to enhance model parameter estimations under multiple violations of assumptions inherent in ordinal data. The results favored a two first-order factor model with ten items measuring the deep approach and nine items measuring the surface approach including a deletion of one item from this instrument. The findings of this study provide empirical evidence for the cultural specificity of the instrument that is consistent with the literature. The R-SPQ-2F is therefore recommended to assess students’ approaches to learning, and further studies into its cultural specificity are recommended.

Investigating Some Construct Validity Threats to TALIS 2018 Teacher Job Satisfaction Scale: Implications for Social Science Researchers and Practitioners

“…The model fits were assessed using selected goodness of fits (GOF) indices such as Tucker Lewis index (TLI), comparative fit index (CFI), root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA), and standardized root mean square residual (SRMR). These GOF indices were used because of the several empirical studies that have demonstrated their satisfactory fitting performance, e.g., (Zakariya 2019). Given the large sample size involved in the current study, the chi-square statistic was not used to assess the model fits directly because of its tendency to reject an acceptable model in the presence of a large sample size (Chen 2007).…”

Calculus Self-Efficacy Inventory: Its Development and Relationship with Approaches to learning

“…This version is a 19-item instrument that measures students' approaches to learning on a five-point Likert scale with 10 items measuring deep approach to learning and 9 items measuring surface approach to learning mathematics. The psychometric properties of this instrument were investigated elsewehere [54,55], and its reliability was found to be appropriate from 0.72 to 0.81 using Raykov and Marcoulides' [56] formula.…”

Study Approaches of Life Science Students Using the Revised Two-Factor Study Process Questionnaire (R-SPQ-2F)

“…There are different studies where the Biggs questionnaire has been used to evaluate students' approaches to learning and its effectiveness has been evaluated in different sociocultural contexts. In fact, the R-SPQ-2F questionnaire has been adapted to several languages [27,32,61,[77][78][79][80][81] and it has been tested in a varied range of contexts. For example, in medical studies, students showed mostly an approach to deep learning in Ghana [32] or Saudi Arabia [82] and similar results were obtained in Malaysia in business, computer, and engineering programs [83].…”