2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00339-015-8992-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of carrier mobility of tubular and planar graphdiyne

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, many properties of graphdiyne nanotubes are still remained unknown. To our knowledge, only recently, a singlelayer sheet and (3, 3) nanotube of graphdiyne have been studied by Jalili et al, in 2015, theoretically [25]. Their results showed that the charge carrier mobility of the graphdiyne nanotube is higher than both graphdiyne sheet and the carbon nanotube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…However, many properties of graphdiyne nanotubes are still remained unknown. To our knowledge, only recently, a singlelayer sheet and (3, 3) nanotube of graphdiyne have been studied by Jalili et al, in 2015, theoretically [25]. Their results showed that the charge carrier mobility of the graphdiyne nanotube is higher than both graphdiyne sheet and the carbon nanotube.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Þ. [29][30][31] Similar to carbon nanotubes, various graphdiyne nanotubes (GDYNTs) can be generated by rolling the corresponding GDY sheets along the chiral vector C h . ¼ na 1 .…”
Section: Structural Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[25][26][27][28] However, to the best of our knowledge, there are only few studies on g-GDY nanotubes. [29][30][31] A systematic study on the structural and electronic properties of the four GDYs (a-, b-, g-, and 6,6,18-GDYs) sheets and their corresponding nanotubes has not been previously reported, which motivate us to undertake the present study. In this work, we employed rst-principle calculations to carry out a detailed investigation of these structures, especially focusing on the inuence of structures, dimensions, tube chirality and size on the electronic properties and carrier mobilities of these GDYs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, unlike graphene with zero bandgap, GDY are characterized by a direct band gap. [ 19,25 ] Many functional theories, including generalized gradient approximation method, [ 26 ] self‐consistent field crystal orbital method, [ 27 ] and DFT [ 28 ] have been used to calculate GDY bandgap, each of which is between 0.46 and 1.10 eV. [ 29 ] In addition, the intrinsic properties of the sp‐hybridized carbon atoms make GDY more easily doped and modified.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%