2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2018.05.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of chemiluminescence measured by luminometry and its application in the estimation of postmortem interval of bone remains

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, fresh iliac samples were characterized by the presence of 73 proteins found exclusively in that sample type and not in tibia samples (Supporting Information, Data 3). Among these, 38 are blood/serum proteins, and the remainder are bonespecific/mineral-binding (17), extracellular matrix (1), ubiq-uitous (13), and muscle (4) proteins. When considering protein-relative abundances, among the 116 proteins with significantly different relative abundances between the various bones and sampling times (i.e., fresh vs skeletonized), 105 (90.5%) were more abundant in the fresh iliac samples, eight (6.9%) in the skeletonized tibia samples, two (1.7%) in the fresh tibia samples, and one (0.9%) in the skeletonized iliac samples (Supporting Information, Data 4).…”
Section: Human Proteomic Inter-skeletal and Inter-individual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, fresh iliac samples were characterized by the presence of 73 proteins found exclusively in that sample type and not in tibia samples (Supporting Information, Data 3). Among these, 38 are blood/serum proteins, and the remainder are bonespecific/mineral-binding (17), extracellular matrix (1), ubiq-uitous (13), and muscle (4) proteins. When considering protein-relative abundances, among the 116 proteins with significantly different relative abundances between the various bones and sampling times (i.e., fresh vs skeletonized), 105 (90.5%) were more abundant in the fresh iliac samples, eight (6.9%) in the skeletonized tibia samples, two (1.7%) in the fresh tibia samples, and one (0.9%) in the skeletonized iliac samples (Supporting Information, Data 4).…”
Section: Human Proteomic Inter-skeletal and Inter-individual Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PMI estimation often relies on visual assessment of gross morphological changes of the body during decomposition, even though the rate of these changes is known to be highly variable. , Accuracy of the PMI estimation decreases as decomposition progresses, and interobserver reliability differs depending on the method and the experience of the researcher. , Biochemical techniques have shown promising results in the search for a precise and accurate method to estimate late PMI in human bone; however, these methods are yet to be validated for use in forensic contexts. …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biochemical techniques have emerged as precise and accurate methods to estimate PMI via analyses of proteins, metabolites, and RNA. These methods need to be validated for applications in forensic contexts [173][174][175]. Among the samples to be used, bone is a promising one for the development of PMI estimation methods with high accuracy, preciseness, and objectiveness.…”
Section: Decomposition Fluidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies focus on bones’ chemical and physical changes after death and the varied factors affecting the diagenetic process [ 16 , 17 , 18 ]. So far, techniques applied to determine the time elapsed since death of skeletal remains include histological examination [ 19 , 20 , 21 ], reaction with a mineral acid, reaction with benzidine, nitrogen loss [ 22 ], proteomics [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 ], metabarcoding [ 27 , 28 ], degradation of lipids, remnants of fat-transgression [ 29 ], high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry [ 30 ], UV-Vis spectroscopic methods [ 11 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34 ], radioisotope measurements [ 27 , 35 , 36 , 37 ], luminol chemiluminescent reaction [ 3 , 36 , 38 , 39 , 40 ], X-ray diffraction [ 10 , 41 , 42 ], micro-computed tomography [ 42 ], and infrared (IR) spectroscopy [ 4 , 8 , 9 , 33 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 ]. Some of these methods are destructive, others lack objectivity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%