“…This does not mean that HGIS is declining, but rather implies that the discipline is extending beyond the boundaries of the social sciences and is becoming applicable to a wide range of disciplines (Knowles, 2016). With proven quantitative and qualitative capabilities (Cope & Elwood, 2009; Sui, 2015; Wang, 2006), HGIS enables us to perform various tasks such as interogating cartographic materials (Manzano, Martínez, & San‐Antonio‐Gomez, 2012), analyzing maps and sketches (Pavlovskaya, 2016), detecting land use and landscape changes (Bender, Boehmer, Jens, & Schumacher, 2005; Herold, 2018; San‐Antonio‐Gómez, Velilla, & Manzano‐Agugliaro, 2014), creating deep maps for examining the meaning of places and serving as multimedia conveyors of places and the everyday lives of their inhabitants (Bodenhamer, Corrigan, & Harris, 2015), reconstructing historical landscape and cityscape (whether in 2D or 3D) (de Boer, 2010; Georgoula, Stamnas, Patias, Georgiadis, & Fragkoulidou, 2013; Nakaya et al, 2010; Rubinowicz & Czyńska, 2015), and resolving complex scenarios of past phenomena or catastrophes (Verhagen & Jeneson, 2012; Zohar, 2017). Additionally, it is now possible to inspect the development of narratives using map stories (Mennis, Mason, & Cao, 2013) and creating new forms of past virtual knowledge (Gregory & Healy, 2007; Knowles, 2008).…”