2019
DOI: 10.1360/sst-2019-0068
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of composite material damage problem using coupled peridynamics and finite element method

Abstract: A mixed finite element method for the unilateral contact problem in elasticity Science in China Series A-Mathematics 49, 513 (2006); Damage identification method of girder bridges based on finite element model updating and modal strain energy SCIENCE CHINA Technological Sciences 58, 701 (2015); Finite element method for viscoelastic medium with damage and the application to structural analysis of solid rocket motor grain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen, the FPM and PG-FPMs can get a good approximation of the temperature distribution in the global domain even if the subdomain boundaries do not coincide with the crack strictly. These results are also qualitatively consistent with ABAQUS and numerical solutions shown in the previous studies 42,25 .…”
Section: Some Practical Examplessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As can be seen, the FPM and PG-FPMs can get a good approximation of the temperature distribution in the global domain even if the subdomain boundaries do not coincide with the crack strictly. These results are also qualitatively consistent with ABAQUS and numerical solutions shown in the previous studies 42,25 .…”
Section: Some Practical Examplessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…As can be seen, the FPM and PG‐FPMs can get a good approximation of the temperature distribution in the global domain even if the subdomain boundaries do not coincide with the crack strictly. These results are also qualitatively consistent with ABAQUS and numerical solutions shown in the previous studies 27,44 …”
Section: D Examplessupporting
confidence: 91%
“…These results are also qualitatively consistent with ABAQUS and numerical solutions shown in the previous studies. 27,44 The corresponding computational parameters and times of the different methods in solving Ex. (1.7) are listed in Table 9.…”
Section: Some Practical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let us consider the case when the plate contains 18 inclusions in the form of circles with a radius of 0.03 and coordinates of the centres as follows: (1) (0.2, 0.9); (2) (0.5, 0.9); (3) (0.8, 0.9); (4) (0.2, 0.75); (5) (0.5, 0.75); (6) (0.8, 0.75); (7) As can be seen from the results shown in Figure 16, we can say that, for the given boundary conditions, identification is better than in the case of problem 8. With an increase in the value of q, inclusions are identified better.…”
Section: Problem 8: Identification Of 18 Inclusions With Different He...mentioning
confidence: 99%