2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jchb.2010.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of dental caries and periapical lesions in a mediaeval population of the southwest France: Differences in visual and radiographic inspections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Contrary to the high figure of 93.2% of MIH previously reported in the Broadgate collection (Ogden et al, ), Kűhnisch and colleagues reported an MIH prevalence of 3.1% among three archaeological collections from late medieval ( n = 191, 12th–16th century, Regensburg, Germany), postmedieval ( n = 33, 16th–18th century, Passau, Germany), and modern age archaeological skeletal series ( n = 99, 19th–20th century, Altdorf, Germany; Kuhnisch et al, ). It is reasonable to assume that due to high prevalence of dental caries, ante mortem loss , calculus, and tooth wear on M1 (Esclassan et al, ; Lucas et al, ; Novak, ; Vodanovic, Brkic, Slaus, & Demo, ) and the greater proportion of adults from 21 to more than 60 years of age (91%; 305/336 subjects), the prevalence could be underestimated (Kuhnisch et al, ). A systematic review highlighted a significant association between MIH and caries (Americano, Jacobsen, Soviero, & Haubek, ) in current populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Contrary to the high figure of 93.2% of MIH previously reported in the Broadgate collection (Ogden et al, ), Kűhnisch and colleagues reported an MIH prevalence of 3.1% among three archaeological collections from late medieval ( n = 191, 12th–16th century, Regensburg, Germany), postmedieval ( n = 33, 16th–18th century, Passau, Germany), and modern age archaeological skeletal series ( n = 99, 19th–20th century, Altdorf, Germany; Kuhnisch et al, ). It is reasonable to assume that due to high prevalence of dental caries, ante mortem loss , calculus, and tooth wear on M1 (Esclassan et al, ; Lucas et al, ; Novak, ; Vodanovic, Brkic, Slaus, & Demo, ) and the greater proportion of adults from 21 to more than 60 years of age (91%; 305/336 subjects), the prevalence could be underestimated (Kuhnisch et al, ). A systematic review highlighted a significant association between MIH and caries (Americano, Jacobsen, Soviero, & Haubek, ) in current populations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To diagnose MIH, at least one first permanent molar (M1) had to be erupted. Because of the often prevalent early damage to the M1 due to dental caries, wear, or ante mortem loss, the adult group (>26 years) was excluded (Esclassan et al, ; Lucas et al, ; Novak, ). Perinatal and those in the age category of 0–11 months were also excluded because the M1 crown is not fully developed, whereas the 1‐ to 5‐year group was included because some isolated M1 germs could be observed.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The location of a carious lesion is usually accurately defined in older scales or protocols regarding the recording and evaluation of dental caries in archeological material. However, sometimes there is a lack of information on its manifestations in the form of discoloration and stains (Buikstra & Ubelaker, ; Moore & Corbett, ; Whittaker et al, ) or it is defined using a fairly general notion of demineralization (Aubry, Mafart, Cherid, & Pasqualini, ; Lucas et al, ). In practice, early signs of caries are not always recorded in the course of research on archeological materials because a considerable number of recording protocols and scales do not include such changes (Esclassan et al, ; Šlaus et al, ; Stránská, Velemínský, & Poláček, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in a study by Lucas et al [12], tooth wear, the main dental feature in historic populations, is reported to be associated, in case of heavy tooth wear, with periapical lesion development via pulpar necrosis. Thus, the first molars, the most worn teeth, are also the most often absent antemortem.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%