1997
DOI: 10.1192/pb.21.3.145
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of effects of constant observation of psychiatric in-patients

Abstract: Constant observation is used in psychiatric practice mainly to prevent acutely III in-patients from self-harm. All In-patients in a psychiatric hospital and a general hospital psychiatric unit who had been on constant observation over a 6 month period were identified (13 patients). These patients and their primary nurses were interviewed using different questionnaires. Most patients felt they had benefited from being on constant observation, but disliked the intrusion on their privacy. The nurses agreed that i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Eight studies described interventions related to constant observations without conducting any formal evaluation (see appendix Table S1). Three of these studies implemented the intervention on psychiatric wards in the UK (Ashaye, Ikkos & Rigby, ; Dennis, ; Pereira & Woollaston, ), and two studies implemented interventions in the United States (Janofsky, ; Sullivan & Rivera, ). The remaining studies did not implement the intervention on an inpatient psychiatric ward or did not report whether the intervention had been implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Eight studies described interventions related to constant observations without conducting any formal evaluation (see appendix Table S1). Three of these studies implemented the intervention on psychiatric wards in the UK (Ashaye, Ikkos & Rigby, ; Dennis, ; Pereira & Woollaston, ), and two studies implemented interventions in the United States (Janofsky, ; Sullivan & Rivera, ). The remaining studies did not implement the intervention on an inpatient psychiatric ward or did not report whether the intervention had been implemented.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies were categorized based on the main intervention components (see Box 1) and whether the intervention made changes directly to constant observation or made systemic organizational changes on the ward. Out of the eight descriptive interventions, three could be categorized into a single component (Bharti et al ., ; Björkdahl et al ., ; Janofsky, ) and the remaining interventions were complex consisting of two or more components (Ashaye, Ikkos & Rigby, ; Dennis, ; Pereira & Woollaston, ; Russ, ; Sullivan & Rivera, ). The most commonly used intervention components were staff education and training, and changes to record keeping and assessment, and one intervention described the use of technology as an alternative tool to constant observation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13,26] Çalışmalar gözlem yapan kişilerce akut bakım ortamında gözlemin stresli ve rahatsız edici olduğunu, aynı şekilde hastalarda tanımadıkları biri tarafından gözlemlendiklerinde kendilerini güvende hissetmediklerini ifade ettiklerini ortaya koymaktadır. [27][28][29] Akut bakımda gözlem bir gözaltı görevi olarak nitelendirilmektense, gözleme tedavi edici, destekleyici bir müda-hale olarak bakılması gerekmektedir. [6,30] Reid ve Long'un İrlanda'da hemşirelerle yaptıkları çalışmada, hemşirelerin bir taraftan hastaların özkıyım girişimlerini önlemede gözlem kullanımını çok etkili bir yöntem olduğu ancak tedavi edici olmadığı belirttilmiştir.…”
Section: Akut Psikiyatri Kliniğinde Gözlem Düzeyleriunclassified
“…Überwachung ist sehr ressourcenintensiv und mit einer unsicheren Evidenz für die Wirksamkeit der Maßnahme verknüpft [1,27,46]. Die Untersuchungen zeigen, dass die Anwesenheit von besser qualifiziertem und erfahrenem Personal auf den Stationen zu einer Reduzierung von Überwachungssituationen führen kann [16,19] [13,47] alternative Überwachungsstrategien einzusetzen oder mindestens täglich deren weitere Notwendigkeit zu überprüfen [48]. Für diese Empfehlung sprechen sowohl klinische als auch ökonomische Gründe.…”
Section: Interventionsebeneunclassified