2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2004.10.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of functional properties of seed storage proteins from indigenous European legume crops (lupin, pea, broad bean) in admixture with polysaccharides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
134
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 194 publications
(141 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
3
134
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The FAs determined in this work for different isolated hazelnut meal proteins were also either comparable with or higher than those of protein isolates obtained from defatted meals of 6 lentil cultivars (average FA: 8.7 mL), 4 chickpea cultivars (average FA: 10.98 mL) and a non-GMO soybean cultivar (6.5 mL) prepared with the IEP method and those of commercial soy (9.1 mL) and whey (11.6 mL) protein isolates tested at the same conditions (concentration, pH, speed of mixing) applied in the current study (Aydemir & Yemenicioglu, 2013). The hazelnut protein isolates (except HPI-AW) also had higher foam stabilities than 1% (w/v) solutions of IEP pea protein isolate, broad bean protein isolate and lupin protein isolate which lost 25e30% of their initial foam volume at pH 7.0 within 30 min (Makri, Papalamprou, & Doxastakis, 2005) and 1% solutions of commercial soy protein isolate and whey protein isolate which lost almost 38% and 100% of their initial foam volume at pH 7.0 within 180 min, respectively (Aydemir & Yemenicioglu, 2013).…”
Section: Foaming Activities and Foam Stabilities Of Isolated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The FAs determined in this work for different isolated hazelnut meal proteins were also either comparable with or higher than those of protein isolates obtained from defatted meals of 6 lentil cultivars (average FA: 8.7 mL), 4 chickpea cultivars (average FA: 10.98 mL) and a non-GMO soybean cultivar (6.5 mL) prepared with the IEP method and those of commercial soy (9.1 mL) and whey (11.6 mL) protein isolates tested at the same conditions (concentration, pH, speed of mixing) applied in the current study (Aydemir & Yemenicioglu, 2013). The hazelnut protein isolates (except HPI-AW) also had higher foam stabilities than 1% (w/v) solutions of IEP pea protein isolate, broad bean protein isolate and lupin protein isolate which lost 25e30% of their initial foam volume at pH 7.0 within 30 min (Makri, Papalamprou, & Doxastakis, 2005) and 1% solutions of commercial soy protein isolate and whey protein isolate which lost almost 38% and 100% of their initial foam volume at pH 7.0 within 180 min, respectively (Aydemir & Yemenicioglu, 2013).…”
Section: Foaming Activities and Foam Stabilities Of Isolated Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…The foaming capacity (FC) of the extracted seed proteins was determined according to Makri et al [2005] by taking 1% of the protein extracted and resuspending it in deionized water, with pH adjusted to 7.4 with 0.1N NaOH and 0.1N HCl. The solution (100 mL) was blended for 3 mins and poured into a 500 mL graduated cylinder.…”
Section: Determination Of Protein Functional Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The defatted hazelnut flour (DHF) was produced according to the method suggested by Makri et al (2005) used for the extraction of legume seeds protein. The hazelnuts were ground in a laboratory blender (Waring Commercial, CT, USA) and the resulting flour was treated with n-hexane (1/3 (w/w)) to remove the fat with constant magnetic stirring for 2 h for three times at ambient temperature.…”
Section: Preparation Of Defatted Hazelnut Flourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Foam can be defined as a two-phase system consisting of air cells separated by thin continuous liquid layer called the lamellar phase (Makri et al 2005). Total foam volume varied from 54 to 51 mL for defatted hazelnut flour protein (DHFP) and defatted hazelnut cake protein (DHCP).…”
Section: Foaming Capacity and Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%