23rd AIAA Aerodynamic Decelerator Systems Technology Conference 2015
DOI: 10.2514/6.2015-2131
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Geometric Porosity on Static Stability and Drag using Computational Fluid Dynamics for Rigid Parachute Shapes

Abstract: This paper explores use of computational fluid dynamics to study the e↵ect of geometric porosity on static stability and drag for NASA's Multi-Purpose Crew Vehicle main parachute. Both of these aerodynamic characteristics are of interest to in parachute design, and computational methods promise designers the ability to perform detailed parametric studies and other design iterations with a level of control previously unobtainable using ground or flight testing. The approach presented here uses a canopy structur… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reliability of the numerical method is verified by comparing the drag coefficient with the literature [12] for different angles of attack. The simulation results of the drag coefficient variation with angle of attack are given in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reliability of the numerical method is verified by comparing the drag coefficient with the literature [12] for different angles of attack. The simulation results of the drag coefficient variation with angle of attack are given in Fig.…”
Section: Numerical Methods Validationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Tutt et al [6] used the ALE method of LS-DYNA software to simulate the main parachute of two North American airborne system candidates, the Advanced Tactical Parachute System (ATPS), one of which is a square parachute and the other is a round parachute; Xiaojuan Shang et al [7] numerically simulated the inflation process of a ring-sail parachute with a draft-top parachute using a fluid-solid coupling calculation method; Takizawa et al [8] numerically simulated the ring-sail parachute of the Orion spacecraft using a fluid-solid coupling (FSI) method to observe its breathing, gliding and oscillation, and proved that the breathing characteristics of the parachute are caused by vortex shedding, the breathing amplitude is related to the head angle, and increasing the hanger length ratio will increase the projection area, thus increasing the drag, etc. ; Tutt et al [9] used the fluid-solid coupling method in LS-DYNA to simulate a 7-foot diameter flat circular parachute and a 5-foot circular seam parachute and compared them with experimental results; Cheng Han et al [10] used the ALE method to numerically simulate the deployment process of a fully folded parachute; Lian Liang et al [11] used the ALE method to numerically simulate the steady descent phase of the Apollo parachute recovery system, studied the flow-solid coupling process of three ringsail parachutes, and simulated the shape change of the parachute and the change of the flow field inside and outside the canopy; Greathouse et al [12] studied the effect of geometric porosity on the static stability and drag of the MPCV main parachute through numerical simulation. Chen et al [13] conducted a numerical study of the effect of incoming Mach number and parachute fabric permeability on the complex flow and aerodynamic characteristics of the parachute system based on computational fluid methods using a rigid model of a scaled-down Mars Science Laboratory disk seam belt parachute.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on pre-test studies using CFD, 4 it was expected that blockage and wall-effects would affect the parachute motion and overall aerodynamics. In addition, the dynamic aerodynamic performance between the sub-scale testing and full-scale drop tests was expected to be different due to scaling.…”
Section: Test Overview and Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In evaluating potential design changes, the team considered many factors including previous design updates to Apollo and Orbiter 5 parachutes that provided improved stability, CFD predictions, 4 and the experience and engineering judgment of parachute experts. The team was also careful to consider potential effects on the performance of the nominal 3-main parachute system, as the pendulum motion was only seen in a contingency 2-main parachute scenario, as well as ensuring that any design changes would not hinder the ability to apply the results of previous full-scale drop testing to evaluation of the final design.…”
Section: Parachute Model Descriptions and Candidate Configurationsmentioning
confidence: 99%