Study of Glenoid Cavity of Human Scapula  and Its Clinical Importance

Parmar, Ajay; Vaghela, Bhadresh; Shah, Kanan; Agarwal, GG

doi:10.16965/ijar.2017.279

Cited by 2 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 9 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Ayrıca, Sinha ve ark.larının yaptıkları bir çalışmada aynı parametreler sırasıyla 34,12 mm ve 18,04 mm iken 15 . Parmar ve ark.larının çalışmasında ise aynı ölçümler sağda ve solda sırasıyla 37,31 mm, 37,46 mm ve 17,89 mm, 18,15 mm olarak bulunmuştur 12 . Bizim çalışmamızda scapula cavitas glenoidalis superior inferior arası genişlik ile scapula cavitas glenoidalis transvers genişliği sırasıyla 36,8 mm ile 25,1 mm olarak bulunmuştur.…”

Section: Gereç Ve Yöntemunclassified

“…11,13,14 . Ayrıca, cavitas glenoidalis şekli ve bölümlerinin bilinmesinin total omuz artroplastilerinde, cavitas glenoidalis kırıklarında, rotator kuff yırtıklarında, glenoid komponentinin uygunluğunun sağlanmasında ve tasarımında, Bankart lezyonu, osteokondral defekt gibi kemiksel patalojilerin değerlendirilmesinde ve pek çok omuz patolojilerinin tedavisinde gerekli olduğu da bildirilmektedir 10,12,14,15 .…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

Morphometric analysis and clinical significance of scapula

Kabakçı

Polat

Yücel

2019

Cukurova Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this study is to obtain morphometric and anatomic measurements of dry human scapula which is an important component of shoulder girdle and compared intercommunal. Materials and Methods: Sixty-nine (69) scapula of unknown gender and age of an Anatolian population are included in this study. Measurement parameters consist of scapula maximum length (SL), scapula maximum width (SW), spine of scapula length (SSL), glenoid cavity inferosuperior width (CGSIW), glenoid cavity anteroposterior width (CGAPW), medial border length supraspinata (MBLS), medial border length infraspinata (MBLI), lateral border length (LBL), the distance between acromion and glenoid cavity (AGCD) and the distance between glenoid cavity and coracoid process (GCCPD). Also, scapular index (SI), glenoid index (GI) and infraspinat index (ISI) were calculated. Results: Sixty nine (69) scapula are divided into two; thirty one (31) right and thirty eight (38) left. The means of measurement parameters and measurements are found as below: Scapula maximum length; 14.08±1.25 cm, scapula maximum width; 9.85±0.80 cm, spine of scapula length; 8.19±0.87 cm, glenoid cavity supero inferior width; 3.68±0.36 cm, glenoid cavity antero-posterior width; 2.51±0.27 cm, medial border length supraspinata; 4.68±0.44 cm, medial border length infraspinata; 10.71±1.11 cm, lateral border length; 12.25±1.15 cm, the distance between acromion and glenoid cavity; 2.63±0.42 cm and the distance between glenoid cavity and coracoid process; 2.00±0.28 cm. Conclusion: Knowing the anatomy of the scapula and obtaining of the morphometric measurements of it, has importance in terms of surgical approaches and pathologies related to scapula. Amaç: Bu çalışmanın amacı, omuz sentürünün önemli bir elemanı olan kuru kemik os scapula'nın morfometrik ve anatomik ölçümlerinin elde edilmesi ve toplumlar arası karşılaştırılmasıdır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya yaşı ve cinsiyeti belirsiz, toplam altmış dokuz (69) adet kuru kemik scapula dahil edildi. Ölçüm parametreleri; Scapula Maksimum Uzunluğu (SU), Scapula Maksimum Genişliği (SG), Spina Scapulae Uzunluğu (SSU), Cavitas Glenoidalis Superior Inferior Genişlik (CGSIG), Cavitas Glenoidalis Antero Posterior Genişlik (CGAPG), Medial Kenar Uzunluğu Supraspinata (MKUS), Medial Kenar Uzunluğu Infraspinata (MKUI), Lateral Kenar Uzunluğu (LKU), Acromion-Cavitas Glenoidalis Arası Mesafe (ACGM) ve Cavitas Glenoidalis-Processus Coracoideus Arası Mesafe (CGPCM)'dir. Ayrıca scapular indeks, glenoid indeks ve infraspinat indeks hesaplanmıştır. Bulgular: Altmış dokuz (69) adet kuru kemik scapula'dan 31 adet sağ, 38 adet sol taraf olarak bulunmuştur. Scapula'ya ait ölçüm parametreleri ve ortalamaları aşağıdaki gibidir:

show abstract

Section: Gereç Ve Yöntemunclassified

Section: Introductionunclassified

Morphometric analysis and clinical significance of scapula

Kabakçı

Polat

Yücel

2019

Cukurova Medical Journal

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Clinical Significance of the Morphometric Structures of the Scapula with the Emphasis on the Glenoid Cavity

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study is to determine the average of the morphometric parameters of the scapula to accurate and successful analyzes in the clinic. Materials and Methods: A total of 24 dry bone scapula, 8 left and 16 right, were included in the study. Parameters determined on the scapula; scapula superio-inferior glenoid diameter (SIGD), anterio-posterior glenoid diameter 1 (APG1), anterio-posterior glenoid diameter 2 (APG2), anterio-posterior glenoid diameter 3 (APG3), scapula width (SW), scapula length (SL), basis-spina distance (BS), spina scapula width (SSW), acromiocoracoid width (AW), scapula margo lateralis length (SML), scapula margo medialis length 1 (SML 1), scapula margo medialis length 2 (SML 2), scapula margo medialis length 3 (SML 3), scapula maximum width (MSW), cavitas glenoidalis antero-posterior width (CGAPW), cavitas glenoidalis superio-inferior width (CGSIW), incisura scapula width (ISW), incisura scapula depth (ISD), the maximum length of proccessus coracoideus (MLPC), maximum proccessus coracoideus thickness (MPCK), the shortest distance between the lateral edge of the proccessus coracoideus tip and the anterior upper edge of the cavitas glenoidalis (PCL-CGK). In addition, scapular index (SI), infraspinate index (ISI), and glenoid index (GI) values were calculated and classified by evaluating the cavitas glenoidalis (CGS), coracoglenoid area (CAS), and incisura scapula shape (ISS). Results: The mean of the determined parameters; SIGD; 3.79±0.31, APG1; 2.47±0.27, APG2; 2.01±0.31, APG3; 2.94±0.55, SW; 10.35±0.84, SL; 15.02±1.17, BS; 7.26±0.82, SSW; 14.4±1.22, AW; 6.18±0.92, SML; 13.43±0.93, SML1; 5.01±0.51, SML2; 11.06±1.1, SML3; 10.15±0.71, MSW; 15,4±1,05, CGAPW; 2.62±0.26, CGSIW; 3.77±0.3, ISW; 8.84±2.18, ISD; 5.25±1.69, MLPC; 44.67±3.23, MPCK;10.06±1.93, PCL-CGK;14.6±1.49. Also SI; 65.8±4.07, ISI; 203.86±18.4, GI; It was calculated as 69.74±5.8. SCG; 87.5% pear type, 8.3% oval type and 4.16% inverted comma type, SCA; 33.3% round shaped, 57.14% square shaped, 9.52% hook shaped, SIS; It is classified as 12.5% type 1, 16.6% type 2, 37.5% type 3 and 33.3% type 4. Conclusion: It is thought that the results of the analysis of the parameters determined in the study will add clinical depth to many surgical approaches such as glenohumeral arthrodesis, internal fixation, fracture stabilization, and rotator cuff tendinitis, in more accurate analysis of shoulder anomalies and fractures.

show abstract

Study of Glenoid Cavity of Human Scapula and Its Clinical Importance

Cited by 2 publications

References 9 publications

Morphometric analysis and clinical significance of scapula

Morphometric analysis and clinical significance of scapula

Clinical Significance of the Morphometric Structures of the Scapula with the Emphasis on the Glenoid Cavity

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About