2021
DOI: 10.1007/jhep02(2021)024
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of $$ {\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{s}}^0 $$ → J/ψπ+π−K+K− decays

Abstract: The decays $$ {\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{s}}^0 $$ B s 0 → J/ψπ+π−K+K− are studied using a data set corresponding to an integrated luminosity of 9 fb−1, collected with the LHCb detector in proton-proton collisions at centre-of-mass energies of 7, 8 and 13 TeV. The decays $$ {\mathrm{B}}_{\mathrm{s}}^0 $$ B s 0 … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Difference in detector resolution due to imperfect modelling: a correction factor of 1.05 for the resolution is applied for the default fit to account for such a difference. This factor was studied for several other decays measured with the LHCb detector and found to lie between 1.0 and 1.1 [29,91,92,[119][120][121]. For decays with relatively low-momentum tracks, this factor is close to 1.05.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…• Difference in detector resolution due to imperfect modelling: a correction factor of 1.05 for the resolution is applied for the default fit to account for such a difference. This factor was studied for several other decays measured with the LHCb detector and found to lie between 1.0 and 1.1 [29,91,92,[119][120][121]. For decays with relatively low-momentum tracks, this factor is close to 1.05.…”
Section: Systematic Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…A follow-up study [90] investigates the underlying nature of the T + cc state, expanding on the modelling of the signal shape and determining its physical properties. The detector resolution is modelled by the sum of two Gaussian functions with a common mean, where the additional parameters are taken from simulation (see Methods) with corrections applied [29,91,92]. The root mean square of the resolution function is around 400 keV/c 2 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quark content X 0 (2900), X 1 (2900) [21,22] cdus χ c1 (3872) [6] ccqq Z c (3900) [23], Z c (4020) [24,25], Z c (4050) [26], X(4100) [27], Z c (4200) [28], Z c (4430) [29][30][31][32], R c0 (4240) [31] ccud Z cs (3985) [33], Z cs (4000), Z cs (4220) [34] ccus χ c1 (4140) [35][36][37][38], χ c1 (4274), χ c0 (4500), χ c0 (4700) [38], X(4630), X(4685) [34], X(4740) [39] ccss X(6900) [14] cccc Z b (10610), Z b (10650) [40] bbud P c (4312) [41], P c (4380) [42], P c (4440), P c (4457) [41], P c (4357) [43] ccuud P cs (4459) [44] ccuds analogous to an antiquark, and as a result the Q 1 Q 2 q1 q2 system has similar degrees of freedom for its light quarks as an antibaryon with a single heavy quark, e.g. the Λ − c or Λ 0 b antibaryons.…”
Section: Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detector mass resolution, R, is modelled with the sum of two Gaussian functions with a common mean, and parameters taken from simulation, see Methods. The widths of the Gaussian functions are corrected by a factor of 1.05, that accounts for a small residual difference between simulation and data [39,104,105]. The root mean square of the resolution function is around 400 keV/c 2 .…”
Section: Statesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation