2018
DOI: 10.15520/ijcrr/2018/9/09/594
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of Medical Waste Management Evaluation Based on Tri Hita Karana Concept in Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to describe the quality of the implementation of the Program Management of Medical Waste-based concept of Tri Hita Karana in Sanglah Hospital in Denpasar in terms of context, input, process, product, and to describe the constraints any encountered in the implementation of the Program Management of Medical Waste-Based Concept of Tri Hita Karana at Sanglah General Hospital, Denpasar. The type of research used is evaluative. The number of samples used was 50 people. Data collection u… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Whereas some of the questions in the questionnaire were straightforward or close-ended, thus requiring only a yes or no answer, others were based on a Likert scale. With a Likert scale, it is possible to rate the extent to which respondents are agreeing or disagreeing with formulated statements [ 5 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. For example, based on a Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither Disagree nor Agree, 4 = Agree and 5 = Strongly Agree, respondents in the present survey were requested to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with each of the statements on household storage and disposal practices of HPWs and their willingness to return such wastes to hospitals and pharmacies.…”
Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whereas some of the questions in the questionnaire were straightforward or close-ended, thus requiring only a yes or no answer, others were based on a Likert scale. With a Likert scale, it is possible to rate the extent to which respondents are agreeing or disagreeing with formulated statements [ 5 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. For example, based on a Likert scale of 1 to 5, where 1 = Strongly Disagree, 2 = Disagree, 3 = Neither Disagree nor Agree, 4 = Agree and 5 = Strongly Agree, respondents in the present survey were requested to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with each of the statements on household storage and disposal practices of HPWs and their willingness to return such wastes to hospitals and pharmacies.…”
Section: Study Area Materials and Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique which was used to analyze the data that had collected on the field trials used the quantitative descriptive technique by comparing the percentage result of the application quality level with a quality standard score that referred to the eleven's scale. As for the formula that was used to determine the quality level of evaluation application can be seen in equation ( 1) [12] while the standard score of evaluation application quality that referred to the eleven's scale can be seen in Table 1 [13].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resiki, Vipriyanti, & Sukerta's research in 2018 [11] described the implementation quality of the Medical Waste Management Program at Sanglah Hospital in Denpasar based on Tri Hita Karana was reviewed from the CIPP (Context-Input-Process-Product) evaluation component and constraints that were faced during the program implementation. The Resiki, Vipriyanti, & Sukerta's research basically has similarities with this study in the matter of research approach which the form evaluative research, but the difference lies in the utilization of evaluation model that was used, where this study used the Countenance model, while in Resiki, Vipriyanti, & Sukerta's research used the CIPP model.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation