2017
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.95.052003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of J/ψ and ψ(3686) decay to Λet al.

Abstract: Using 1310.6 × 10 6 J=ψ and 447.9 × 10 6 ψð3686Þ events collected with the BESIII detector at the BEPCII e þ e − collider, the branching fractions and the angular distributions of J=ψ and ψð3686Þ decays to ΛΛ and Σ 0Σ0 final states are measured. The branching fractions are determined, with much improved precision, to be 19.43 AE 0.03 AE 0.33, 11.64 AE 0.04 AE 0.23, 3.97 AE 0.02 AE 0.12 and 2.44 AE 0.03 AE 0.11 for J=ψ → ΛΛ, J=ψ → Σ 0Σ0 , ψð3686Þ → ΛΛ and ψð3686Þ → Σ 0Σ0 , respectively. The polar angular distri… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 55 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A measurement of their strengths can be helpful to extract information about the underlying dynamics of the decay process. We therefore performed an angular analysis [38] [9]). The helicity angle, θ ω , defined by the scattering angle of the ω with respect to the electron beam in the e þ e − center-of-mass frame was reconstructed for each event.…”
Section: Angular Distribution Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A measurement of their strengths can be helpful to extract information about the underlying dynamics of the decay process. We therefore performed an angular analysis [38] [9]). The helicity angle, θ ω , defined by the scattering angle of the ω with respect to the electron beam in the e þ e − center-of-mass frame was reconstructed for each event.…”
Section: Angular Distribution Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ΛΛ 440675 ± 670 19.43 ± 0.03 ± 0.33 ψ(2S) → ΛΛ 31119 ± 187 3.97 ± 0.02 ± 0.12 J/ψ → Σ 0Σ0 111026 ± 335 11.64 ± 0.04 ± 0.23 ψ(2S) → Σ 0Σ0 6612 ± 82 2.44 ± 0.03 ± 0.11 J/ψ → Σ(1385) 0Σ (1385) 0 102762 ± 852 10.71 ± 0.09 J/ψ → Ξ 0Ξ0 134846 ± 437 11.65 ± 0.04 ψ(2S) → Σ(1385) 0Σ (1385) 0 2214 ± 148 0.69 ± 0.05 ψ(2S) → Ξ 0Ξ0 10839 ± 123 2.73 ± 0.03 J/ψ → Ξ −Ξ+ 42811 ± 231 10.40 ± 0.06 J/ψ → Σ(1385) −Σ (1385) + 42595 ± 467 10.96 ± 0.12 J/ψ → Σ(1385) +Σ (1385) − 52523 ± 596 12.58 ± 0.14 ψ(2S) → Ξ −Ξ+ 5337 ± 83 2.78 ± 0.05 ψ(2S) → Σ(1385) −Σ (1385) + 1375 ± 98 0.85 ± 0.06 ψ(2S) → Σ(1385) +Σ (1385) − 1470 ± 95 0.84 ± 0.05 TABLE I. Available B1B2 data samples and the branching fractions from recent BESIII publications[11][12][13].…”
unclassified
“…We show that the same information can TABLE I. Branching fractions for some J/ψ, ψ → BB decays and the estimated sizes of the data samples from the full data set of 10 10 J/ψ and 3.2×10 9 ψ in the BESIII proposal [11]. The approximate detection efficiencies for the final states reconstructed using Λ → pπ − and Ξ → Λπ decay modes are based on the published BESIII analyses using partial data sets [12][13][14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 86%