2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.cemconres.2006.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of rehabilitation mortars: Construction of a knowledge correlation matrix

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, those values are still very good for rendering mortars [52,53]. These results may be explained by a highest w/b ratio (as compared to the reference mortar) and an increase of cork dosage (with much lower mechanical resistance) as sand replacement.…”
Section: Mechanical Strength and Porositymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, those values are still very good for rendering mortars [52,53]. These results may be explained by a highest w/b ratio (as compared to the reference mortar) and an increase of cork dosage (with much lower mechanical resistance) as sand replacement.…”
Section: Mechanical Strength and Porositymentioning
confidence: 85%
“…There has recently been increased scientific interest in lime-based mortars and their uses, as they show greater compatibility with ancient building materials and fulfil the recommendations of ICCROM [1] about the use of materials similar to the original ones in repair work [2][3][4][5]. Furthermore, they have been widely used in modern work with decorative and protective purposes (renders and facades) [6,7].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, traces of C 4 AF were present in sample groups RB and CFK. Considering the literature studies [18,24,36,40], it was theorised that different proportions of cement were present in mortar groups BC, C6, RB and CFK. This supposition is in alignment with the average normalised compressive strength of these four mortar groups (f 0 j ranged between 1.56 and 6.65 MPa), which were within the upper bound of the average normalised compressive strengths of all mortar groups considered (refer to Table 7).…”
Section: Powder X-ray Diffraction Analysis Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%