Background: Great wellbeing is a pre-essential of human useful and improvement measure. Raised BP stays the main source of death around the world, representing 10.4 million passings each year. Many research has demonstrated the positive effects of inspiratory muscle exercise (IME) on cardiac autonomic function, indicated by reduced sympathetic modulation and increased vagal modulation in young smokers, as well as hypertensive and heart failure patients. Alternate nostril yoga breathing (ANYB) is one of the effective breathing techniques which involve breathing through one nostril at a time while closing the other nostril manually. The normal nasal cycle consists of alternating phases of congestion and decongestion of nasal tissue based on the predominance of parasympathetic or sympathetic tone in the autonomic nervous system. Method: Ethical approval was obtained from the SAFE SEARCH INDEPENDENT ETHICS COMMITTEE. N=30 Essential Hypertensive patients age between 35 to 55, both male and female included in this pilot study and the further study continues with more sample. After taking consent the patients were divided randomly into two groups. Group A Inspiratory muscle training (15) and Group B (15) Alternative nostril yoga breathing. Both 3081 groups received treatment for 4 weeks and 5 days/week. Pre and postmeasurement were taken that includes Blood pressure, resting heart rate, and QoL (MINICHAL). Result: Mean age-wise distribution of patients 49 and SD ± 4.2. During pre-measurement, there was no significant difference between the two groups for SDB, DBP, RHR, and QoL but post means treatment value of SBP (t=-3.062, p=<0.05) mmHg, RHR (t=-2.61,p=<0.05) bpm, QoL (t=-2.12, p=<0.05) and in both group A and group B, but more significant improvement was found in SBP, RHR and QoL in group A compared to group B. However DBP showed no significant difference between Group A and Group B (t=0.46, p>0.05) mmHg. The result suggested Group B that is IMT is more effective. Conclusion: This study concludes that both the study group has significant improvement in the SBP, RHR, and QoL, but patient receiving Inspiratory muscle training has a more beneficial effect in SBP, RHR, and QoL, while there is no significant difference found in DBP between the two-groups.