Study of the Complexity Game of Supply Chain Green Innovation Introduction under EPR Policy and Government Subsidies

Abstract

Nowadays, with global scientific and technological levels rapidly improving, innovation has been a great need for enterprises to solve the dilemma. Combined with EPR (Extended Producer Responsibility) and the topic of remanufacturer, adopting green innovation has been an effective way when green supply chain management is applied. In this paper, we focus on the activity of green innovation and build a model where the manufacturer will invest in green innovation to improve the product availability rate of recycled products and save the cost in the process of remanufacturing. Besides, we take three stages in a cycle into consideration, that is, production/sale, recycling used production, and remanufacture/sale, and meanwhile, the government gives a subsidy to enterprises to encourage the activity of recycling. In the process of model solving, we take a dynamic decision-making way into consideration. We find that the decision adjustment speed of players has a significant effect on the stability, and in a long dynamic repeated game process, with the speed of decision adjustment increasing, the system enters into chaos at the end of the process. It is interesting that when the speed of decision adjustment exceeds the critical point of the bifurcation diagram, the profit of the manufacturer decreases and then enters a chaotic state. Besides, with the level of subsidies increasing, the area of stable region decreases gradually. Certain investment has a positive effect on product selling and recycling as well as the profit, and the government subsidy undoubtedly raises the profit of manufacturers and encourages the activity of recycling. In the end, we make chaos control by adjusting the decision method.

Research on Dynamic and Complexity of Duopoly Price Strategies between Low‐Carbon and Nonlow‐Carbon Products under Cap‐and‐Trade Policies

“…We can get from Figure 16 that the delayed feedback method can not effectively control the two nonlinear systems in this paper. is is contrary to the research results of chaos control in [49], which means that we consider that the efficiency of the delayed feedback control method is higher than that of the parameter adjustment control method.…”

“…It is necessary to take some measures to delay or eliminate chaos and benefit the whole system. ere are many methods to control chaos, namely, delayed feedback control [34,46], variable feedback control [47,48], and parameter adjustment [49]. In this section, the parameter adjustment method and delay control method are adopted to control the market prices of participants.…”

“…Compare the control efficiency of delayed feedback and parameter adjustment methods. It is the same as the comparison of chaos control research methods in [49] literature. Set the v as the control parameter and consider the output signal of the system when making decisions in the next period of the system.…”

Innovation Efficiency of High-Tech SMEs Listed in China: Its Measurement and Antecedents

“…e Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) views technological innovation as comprising new products or services and the making of significant changes in the products and processes, and innovation is realized when the new product or service is introduced in the market [1]. Technology innovation is the driving force in promoting economic growth [2][3][4][5], particularly so for developing economies. In the case of China, the 18 th Party Congress of China put forward the implementation of innovation driven development strategy and stressed that technology innovation is the strategic support for improving social productivity and overall national strength and must be put at the heart of the overall national development.…”

Research on Government Subsidy Strategies for the Development of Agricultural Products E-Commerce

“…Government subsidy plays a role in developing the economy, promoting enterprise technology or product innovation and reducing poverty. Research on government subsidy mainly focuses on low-carbon energy conservation and emission reduction [22,23], recycling of waste products [24,25], and old for new [26,27]. For example, the study of Wang et al [28] showed that government subsidy has improved the overall operating efficiency of the closed-loop supply chain of low-carbon E-commerce and the total social surplus.…”