2014
DOI: 10.1097/hp.0b013e3182a414ba
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the Counting Efficiency of a WBC Setup by Using a Computational 3D Human Body Library in Sitting Position Based on Polygonal Mesh Surfaces

Abstract: A realistic computational 3D human body library, called MaMP and FeMP (Male and Female Mesh Phantoms), based on polygonal mesh surface geometry, has been created to be used for numerical calibration of the whole body counter (WBC) system of the nuclear power plant (NPP) in Doel, Belgium. The main objective was to create flexible computational models varying in gender, body height, and mass for studying the morphology-induced variation of the detector counting efficiency (CE) and reducing the measurement uncert… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The CE results obtained for the MaMP and FeMP of 1.80 m in height and 81 kg and 83 kg in weight for the male and female phantoms, respectively shown that the CE values for MaMP are systematically smaller than those for FeMP over the whole energy range, with differences of the order of 5-7%, and this was observed also for female and male phantoms of different heights. The same results were observed in our previous work using the HPGe detector, when comparing the MaMP and FeMP phantoms with 1.80 m in height and ∼85 kg [8]. This is due to the anatomical characteristics of the two phantoms.…”
Section: Mamp and Femp Mesh Phantomssupporting
confidence: 88%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The CE results obtained for the MaMP and FeMP of 1.80 m in height and 81 kg and 83 kg in weight for the male and female phantoms, respectively shown that the CE values for MaMP are systematically smaller than those for FeMP over the whole energy range, with differences of the order of 5-7%, and this was observed also for female and male phantoms of different heights. The same results were observed in our previous work using the HPGe detector, when comparing the MaMP and FeMP phantoms with 1.80 m in height and ∼85 kg [8]. This is due to the anatomical characteristics of the two phantoms.…”
Section: Mamp and Femp Mesh Phantomssupporting
confidence: 88%
“…This trend result is not systematic for all FeMP phantoms of different heights and approximate same weights. A different trend was found in a previous study [8] while simulating the CE for a HPGe detector and FeMP phantoms of ∼80 kg and ∼100 kg in a different counting geometry.…”
Section: Femp Mesh Phantomscontrasting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations