2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2013.09.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the dielectric behavior of Co–Ni–Li nanoferrites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
11
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
1
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…12 the existence of one semicircle for x ¼ 0.00 and 0.05, indicating that the grain boundaries effect is more dominant than the grain effect in the conduction mechanism. 68,69 For x ¼ 0.10 the Cole-Cole plot shows the existence of two successive semi-circular peaks. The rst semicircle is attributed to the contribution of grain boundary (interfacial properties) and the second one is associated to the grain (bulk properties).…”
Section: Electrical Modulus Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…12 the existence of one semicircle for x ¼ 0.00 and 0.05, indicating that the grain boundaries effect is more dominant than the grain effect in the conduction mechanism. 68,69 For x ¼ 0.10 the Cole-Cole plot shows the existence of two successive semi-circular peaks. The rst semicircle is attributed to the contribution of grain boundary (interfacial properties) and the second one is associated to the grain (bulk properties).…”
Section: Electrical Modulus Analysismentioning
confidence: 98%
“…(b) )[33,[47][48][49]. The value of τ is 3.18 𝜇𝑠 for 0.65 V and 1.59 𝜇𝑠 for 1.20 V. As seen experimental results, τ increases with increasing the voltage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 58%
“…The dielectric relaxation time ( τ ) of the device is obtained by the relation τ =1/ω = 1 / 2π f. τ is obtained from the plot of 𝑀 ′′ − 𝑓 (Figure The 𝑀 ′′ vs. 𝑀 ′ (Cole-Cole) for the device at 300 K is indicated in Figure 10. The 𝑀 ′′ vs. 𝑀 ′ is more efficient than the 𝑍 ′′ vs. 𝑍 ′ in allocating the relaxation effects from grain boundaries (resistive plates) and grains (conducting regions) in dielectric materials [33,47]. As can be seen Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various methods of synthesizing cobalt ferrite and doped cobalt ferrite with different magnetic properties have been developed, including solid-state reaction at low temperatures [8,13,14], co-precipitation method [9,15], ball milling method [16,17], hydrothermal treatment [18,19], sol-gel synthesis [20][21][22], ceramic method [23][24][25], microwave method [26,27], polyol method [28], citrate precursor method [29,30], and solvothermal method [31,32]. The magnetic properties of cobalt-based ferrites highly depend on the composition, synthesis method, and calcination temperature.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%