2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2015.06.020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the fatigue behaviour of dissimilar aluminium joints produced by friction stir welding

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
26
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The hook-like defects (Figure 11) similar to the JLR seriously affected the material fatigue properties [81]. The fatigue strength of the FSW lap joint was less than 5.6% of the tensile strength of base metal [82]. Joint Line Remnant (JLR) is a flaw in the nugget region which is caused by the natural oxide layer on the workpiece surfaces before welding [76,79], as shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Weld Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The hook-like defects (Figure 11) similar to the JLR seriously affected the material fatigue properties [81]. The fatigue strength of the FSW lap joint was less than 5.6% of the tensile strength of base metal [82]. Joint Line Remnant (JLR) is a flaw in the nugget region which is caused by the natural oxide layer on the workpiece surfaces before welding [76,79], as shown in Figure 10.…”
Section: Weld Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The hook-like defects (Figure 11) similar to the JLR seriously affected the material fatigue properties [81]. The fatigue strength of the FSW lap joint was less than 5.6% of the tensile strength of base metal [82]. reduced due to inadequate pressure between the rear side of the tool and workpiece material.…”
Section: Weld Defectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In case of FSW, flat dog-bone shape samples are being used. Tensile, bending and fatigue performance of the FSW material are subjected to different loading conditions and the resulting data are used to understand the mechanical behavior of the joints [75][76][77]. Metallographic examinations can also reveal details of microstructure and some types of defects in FSW material such as lack of penetration and kissing bonds [64].…”
Section: Destructive Testing and Evaluation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All joints tensile tests were made at 1 mm/min crosshead speed. Remote stress was calculated for all joints, by dividing the axial load by the substrate cross section outside of the overlap as in previous works . Joint efficiency was calculated by dividing the maximum remote stress with the base material ultimate tensile strength.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%