1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf00157005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the substructure of the Morgagni and Brunescens cataract with the TAO non-coating technique

Abstract: Lens tissue from a Morgagni cataract was examined by SEM and TEM. For SEM, after prefixation with glutaraldehyde and postfixation with the tannic acid/arginine/OsO4 non-coating (TAO) technique, and for TEM, after prefixation with glutaraldehyde, postfixation with OsO4/K4Fe(CN)6 and poststaining with uranyl acetate/lead citrate. The TAO technique seems to be a particularly suitable postfixation method for the SEM investigation of cataract tissue because of the presence of the protein structures present. The cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1993
1993
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[24][25][26][27] New techniques such as photon spectroscopy for in vivo analysis of lenses remain to be further investigated. 28 Other workers have studied in vitro features such as size, 29 chemical, 30,31 dielectric properties 32 or histological appearance 33 of lenses and linked them with preoperative features such as nuclear colour, but have not examined nuclear hardness. Assia et al 8 examined the link between histological appearance and nuclear hardness, but found no relationship when simple staining techniques were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[24][25][26][27] New techniques such as photon spectroscopy for in vivo analysis of lenses remain to be further investigated. 28 Other workers have studied in vitro features such as size, 29 chemical, 30,31 dielectric properties 32 or histological appearance 33 of lenses and linked them with preoperative features such as nuclear colour, but have not examined nuclear hardness. Assia et al 8 examined the link between histological appearance and nuclear hardness, but found no relationship when simple staining techniques were used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slices then were fixed again in GA (24h; 40C), whereafter a part of the material was prepared for LM and TEM and another part for SEM according the procedure described before [14][15][16]. The lenses were then fixed in cacodylate buffered GA (2%; 2 h) and carefully sliced (2 x 2 x 2 mm) for LM, SEMen TEM, whereafter under the stereomicroscope the cortical and nuclear areas were selected.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%