1998
DOI: 10.1128/jvi.72.12.9855-9864.1998
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of the V3 Loop as a Target Epitope for Antibodies Involved in the Neutralization of Primary Isolates versus T-Cell-Line-Adapted Strains of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1

Abstract: Previous studies characterized the third variable (V3) loop of the envelope gp120 as the principal neutralizing determinant for laboratory T-cell-line-adapted (TCLA) strains of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1). However, primary viruses isolated from infected individuals are more refractory to neutralization than TCLA strains, suggesting that qualitatively different neutralizing antibodies may be involved. In this study, we investigated whether the V3 loop constitutes a linear target epitope for anti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 73 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high degree of conservation in the V3 region supports the data suggesting that this region may not be the target of the potent neutralizing responses in these individuals and perhaps anti-V3 antibodies in subtype C infection may not be of great biological relevance in driving the viral escape from the neutralization response. The neutralization response obtained in our study was not associated with any particular mutation in the V3 region, which may be an indication that other variable regions of the HIV-1 envelope might be involved in generating a neutralization response, 27,35 which needs to be studied in greater detail. However, an antibody response could be generated by the interaction of the V3 loop with other regions of gp120, which may play a role in neutralization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The high degree of conservation in the V3 region supports the data suggesting that this region may not be the target of the potent neutralizing responses in these individuals and perhaps anti-V3 antibodies in subtype C infection may not be of great biological relevance in driving the viral escape from the neutralization response. The neutralization response obtained in our study was not associated with any particular mutation in the V3 region, which may be an indication that other variable regions of the HIV-1 envelope might be involved in generating a neutralization response, 27,35 which needs to be studied in greater detail. However, an antibody response could be generated by the interaction of the V3 loop with other regions of gp120, which may play a role in neutralization.…”
mentioning
confidence: 64%
“…For example, we now know that whereas isolate-specific V3-specific antibodies are produced early after infection or immunization 68,69,82 , broadly reactive V3-specific antibodies are characteristic of a more mature immune response 86,88 . Similarly, the conclusion that V3-specific antibodies are ineffective for neutralizing primary isolates was based on inefficient depletion of antibodies from HIV-1 + sera with linear V3 peptides -a process that would have failed to effectively remove antibodies that are specific for conformation-sensitive V3 epitopes 97,98 . Moreover, careful review of early studies, as well as more recent data published by several groups, shows that epitopes in the V3 loop are not cryptic but are at least partially displayed on the surface of R5 virus particles and R5virus-infected cells 36,37,89,90,99,100 , and that V3-specific monoclonal antibodies can neutralize R5 as well as X4 viruses 86,87,89,90,101 .…”
Section: Focusing the Antibody Responsementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Second, the protein also includes B-cell epitopes associated with several immuneeffector mechanisms. [46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53] Our results show that CR3 is able to induce an IgG recognition pattern in sera to HIV-1 proteins, after i.n. and s.c. immunization, similar to seropositive persons.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 51%