2000
DOI: 10.1063/1.1287220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study of x-ray emission from a table top plasma focus and its application as an x-ray backlighter

Abstract: A study of a 2 kJ, 200 kA, table top plasma focus device as an intense x-ray source is reported. The x-ray yield from a number of gases, (deuterium, nitrogen, neon, argon, and xenon) is measured as a function of filling pressure and in neon as a function of anode length. In gases with Z<18, the plasma implodes to form a uniform cylindrical column, whereas for Z⩾18, the plasma consists of a number of hot spots. A maximum x-ray yield of 16.6 J and pulse length of 10–15 ns was obtained in neon. The x-ray e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
35
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 99 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. A most comprehensive review of the state of the art can be found in Bernard et al 10 The approach followed in the present work is to use the electron beam generated backward by the Plasma Focus device to generate xrays upon conversion of the beam onto a metal target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9]. A most comprehensive review of the state of the art can be found in Bernard et al 10 The approach followed in the present work is to use the electron beam generated backward by the Plasma Focus device to generate xrays upon conversion of the beam onto a metal target.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A comparison of the results shows that x-ray generation efficiency in the argon-hydrogen mixture is clearly large as compared to 0.01%-0.1% obtained by pure hydrogen 27 and the 0.001%-0.02% obtained by pure argon. 12,16,21 Kato and Be 9 using an argon-hydrogen mixture reported the x-ray generation efficiency of 1.4% from 2.8 kJ PF device. The low x-ray generation efficiency of 0.39% in our case as compared to Ref.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…An important part of the recent experimental studies on x-ray and particle emission from PF is oriented in interesting applications such as contact microscopy, x-ray and electron beam lithography, generation of soft x-ray spectral lines of highly charged heavy metal ions, metal coating by ion sputtering, surface modification and deposition of thin films, x-ray backlighting, radiography of biological and mechanical objects, and micromachining. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16] The x-ray emission from a given PF device depends in a rather complicated way upon the design and operating parameters such as the operating voltage and bank energy, [17][18][19] the circuit inductance, 20 the working gas nature and pressure, 12,16,21 the anode dimensions, shape, and material, [22][23][24][25][26][27] the material and configuration of insulator sleeve, 28 and preionization assisted breakdown. 29,30 It is reported that when the plasma focus is operated in hydrogen with small admixture of inert gases, the x-ray emission is strongly enhanced.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the latter, applications such as soft x-ray imaging of biological specimens [1][2][3][4] or small samples 5 and soft x-ray lithography or micromachining [6][7][8][9][10][11] were reported. Other important results were obtained using a PF as an x-ray backlighter for photon energies of about 1 keV; 12,13 tailoring the output efficiency in the 1.2-1.3 keV window, 14 or enhancing the Cu K␣ ͑Ref. 15͒ line emission from the focus region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%