2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11431-013-5284-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Study on coupled 3D seepage and stress fields of the complex channel project

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Jia studied the long-term hydromechanical coupled behaviour of Belgium Boom clay to explain the effect of seepage on deformation [27]. Zhong et al used a 3D simulation technique, the volume of fluid (VOF) method, and the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations to investigate the seepage of clay coupled with cyclic stress [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Jia studied the long-term hydromechanical coupled behaviour of Belgium Boom clay to explain the effect of seepage on deformation [27]. Zhong et al used a 3D simulation technique, the volume of fluid (VOF) method, and the Navier-Stokes (N-S) equations to investigate the seepage of clay coupled with cyclic stress [28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantification parameters considered in this article include fractal dimension, genus number, and order of continuity, which respectively reveal the hidden information of geological data in the new dimension of complexity including inhomogeneous geometries, arbitrary connectivity and discontinuous topologies. The parametric geomodeling methodology constructs a connection between the measures of structural complexity and the elements of the T‐spline surfaces delimiting rock volumes, and this framework is beneficial to stochastic geomodeling, dynamic model updating, and the application of statistical approaches, numerical methods and nature inspired computing algorithms in geospatial analysis (Ao et al., ; Lindsay et al., ; Siddique and Adeli, , , b, ; Wellmann et al., ; Zhong et al., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To further understand this process, many geologists have performed detailed research on models of geological geometric features [9,10]; these models can be divided into several types: wire-frame models, surface models, voxel models, constructive solid geometry (CSG) models, boundary representation (B-rep) models, and hybrid models. Triangular irregular networks (TIN) [11], Tetrahedral network (TEN) [12], B-rep [13], and Generalized tri-prism (GTP) [14] models are commonly used for the fast and accurate geometrical construction [15] of specialized geological phenomena, although difficulties still exist in building spatial relationships between geometric objects. These models mainly focus on the geometry modelling of geological phenomena [16], and a few of them consider the relationships of geological phenomena in strata, but it cannot fully describe the geological relationships [17] between folds, faults, and strata, and it lacks corresponding description of geological semantics [18,19] for geometric elements in the modelling process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%